I'm a senior now, and after four years of seeing these clubs recruit, knowing people in a lot of them, watching where members end up, and hearing way too much business club drama, I figured I'd give my honest thoughts before I graduate.
Every fall there are like 50 professional clubs at EAF telling freshmen they're the most selective organization at UCLA and that joining them will single-handedly get you into Goldman/McKinsey/Google lol.
Obviously this is subjective. I'm mostly ranking based on placements, alumni network, actual opportunities, reputation, culture, and what I've seen over the last few years. Also the difference between like #2 and #4 in most categories really isn't that deep.
Mainly making this for freshmen/sophomores who have literally no idea what any of these acronyms mean.
CONSULTING
- Bruin Consulting
Historically probably the biggest name in UCLA consulting and they've had some insane clients. Tiny classes and ridiculously hard to get into.
- UConsulting
Could easily be #1 depending on who you ask. Really strong consulting placements, good alumni network, legit clients, and a pretty established recruiting pipeline.
- Bruin Strategy Network
Lowkey has moved up a lot recently. Strong clients and especially good if you're interested in healthcare consulting/investing. Seems pretty tight knit too.
- The Bruin Group
One of the older consulting clubs and still very solid. Good alumni network, placements and culture. Doesn't get talked about quite as much as BC/UC anymore but still easily one of the better consulting clubs.
- 180 Degrees Consulting
Probably the best social-impact consulting club. Clients are more nonprofits/social impact orgs, but you still get legitimate consulting experience and the culture seems more normal/chill than some of the super sweaty clubs.
- Net Impact
Similar social impact/ESG lane. Projects aren't always as flashy as the top consulting clubs but there are always some really cracked people in it and they have a surprisingly strong alumni network.
- Global Research & Consulting (GRC)
Seems to have improved a lot recently. Good mix of startups/nonprofits/other clients and definitely a solid option.
- Clean Consulting
More sustainability/environment focused. Good if that's specifically what you're interested in.
- International Business for Bruins
Still a solid org with some strong individual members/alumni, just doesn't have quite the same overall recruiting infrastructure as the clubs above.
Rough tiers:
S: UC, BC
A: BSN, TBG, 180DC
B: Net Impact, GRC
C: Clean, IBB
FINANCE / INVESTMENT BANKING
Honestly this is probably the category where arguing rankings matters the least because the top clubs all recruit for the same firms and know the same people.
If you get into one of the top four and like the people, just take the offer.
- Bruin Asset Management (BAM)
Probably still the consensus #1. Really strong placements, huge presence in UCLA finance, strong alumni, and probably the best combination of recruiting prep + social culture.
Also has a reputation for being very Greek-life heavy depending on the class lol.
- Bruin Value Investing (BVI)
Could easily argue this over BAM. Probably the most technically intense finance club. Strong alumni network, serious recruiting prep and historically ridiculous placements.
Basically if you want people making you do mock superdays while everyone else is at Rocco's, this is probably your club.
- Bruin Hedge Fund (BHF)
Has gotten way stronger over the last few years. Strong placements and seems like a decent middle ground between the social vibe of BAM and sweatiness of BVI.
- Bruin Investment & Trading Group (BIT)
Still firmly in the top group. More explicitly IB focused than some of the others and members place extremely well.
- Bruin Capital Management
Good way to get investing experience and definitely worth applying to, just doesn't have quite the same IB pipeline as the four above.
- Scholars of Finance
More broad finance/career development than pure IB. Good community and probably a better fit if you want finance without making investment banking your entire personality.
Basically:
S: BAM, BVI, BHF, BIT
A/B: BCM, Scholars of Finance
If you're specifically trying to do IB, getting into the UCLA Investment Banking Workshop eventually matters more than arguing whether BAM or BVI is #1.
BUSINESS / PROFESSIONAL FRATS
- Sigma Eta Pi (SEP)
Still at 1 even though technically an entrepreneurship frat, but their placements are probably the strongest overall out of the professional frats, especially across tech/SWE/PM, startups, VC, consulting, and some finance.
Their alumni network is also kind of ridiculous, alumni startups have collectively raised $1B+, and a lot of founders/operators still seem connected to the org. They also probably have the most diverse mix of people and easily the best marketing, which is why they pull huge rush numbers every year. Probably the hardest to get into though.
- Delta Sigma Pi (DSP)
Probably the strongest traditional business frat, especially if you’re interested in finance or consulting. They have a really established alumni network, solid recruiting infrastructure, and a lot of overlap with the top finance/consulting clubs on campus.
I do think they’ve fallen off a little from their peak a few years ago, but they still have strong placements and a recognizable name. The pledge process also seems like a massive time commitment, so definitely something to consider.
- Alpha Kappa Psi (AKPsi)
Still a solid org with a broad mix of people going into finance, consulting, tech, PM, marketing, etc., and they have a big national alumni network.
The biggest knock IMO is that their classes have gotten really large, so it doesn’t feel nearly as selective or tight-knit as SEP or DSP. It kind of feels like they let a lot of people in compared to the other two, which can dilute the value of the network/community a bit. Still useful, just not on the same level for me.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP / TECH / PRODUCT
This category gets underrated in a lot of UCLA business club rankings.
If you're CS/engineering or interested in startups/VC/PM instead of IB or consulting, I would honestly prioritize some of these OVER the traditional business clubs.
- Product Space
Probably one of the best professional orgs at UCLA period.
You work on actual product projects and the experience is extremely relevant if you're trying to recruit for PM/tech. People basically treat the project experience like an internship on their resume.
Downside is it's insanely competitive.
- Bruin Ventures
Probably one of the most well-rounded business clubs at UCLA. Entrepreneurship, startups, VC, consulting, tech, finance, people go into basically everything.
Also has a really strong founder culture and members actually seem to build companies instead of just talking about entrepreneurship.
The interview process is rough though.
- VEST
Really new club, but probably the most pure entrepreneurship/founder-focused club. If your main goal is actually starting a company rather than recruiting for Goldman/McKinsey, definitely worth looking into.
- Undergraduate Business Society (UBS)
Hard to compare because it's much bigger and less selective. Tons of programs/workshops across finance, consulting and general career development.
Not as tight-knit as the smaller clubs obviously, but probably one of the best ways to get exposure to business at UCLA if you don't make one of the super selective clubs freshman year.
With all this being said
The biggest thing freshmen need to understand is that you absolutely do not need one of these clubs to get a good internship.
The actual advantage is:
- older students who've already gone through recruiting
- alumni
- projects
- friends who are also ambitious
- referrals/connections
- structured interview/recruiting prep
Also don't get sucked into UCLA business club prestige brainrot. Half the people arguing about whether their 4% acceptance rate club is better than someone's 6% acceptance rate club are going to end up working at the exact same companies anyway.
Go to recruitment events, meet the actual people, apply to a bunch, and join wherever you genuinely like the people.
Curious what people would change because I'm sure the comments are about to be a war zone.