r/nottheonion 19h ago

Reese Witherspoon Chosen as Jury Foreman After Jurors Thought She Went to Law School Because of Legally Blonde

https://www.fashiontimes.co.uk/reese-witherspoon-jury-duty-mix-1763528
25.2k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

24

u/hairsprayking 18h ago

Where i live, Lawyers can't serve on a jury because they know the law too well lol

3

u/Tricky-Ad7897 17h ago

Even if they can serve if the lawyers doing the selection figure out you're a lawyer you're not getting selected. Their job is to find the dumbest, most gullible group of people possible so they can convince them of their story.

3

u/hairsprayking 17h ago

what if they're so dumb that the other guys convince them though...

8

u/RegulatoryCapture 16h ago

Exactly. People oversimplify this without thinking it through.

Lawyers on each side have limited challenges they can use if they can't get a juror dismissed by the judge on more universal grounds.

You want a panel of jurors that can be swayed by the evidence you plan to present. If your defense is complex, you want jurors who can follow the logic. If your defense is weak, you might want jurors who will make emotional decisions and ignore facts. If your prosecution relies on cop testimony, you don't want jurors biased against cops.

-2

u/20_mile 17h ago

Lawyers

MSG also uses bots to troll law firm websites, download the photos, and then AI to scan for those faces trying to see a game or a concert, and these people are subsequently refused entry.

1

u/less_unique_username 13h ago

Sentient monosodium glutamate?! Chinese biolabs have gone too far!

1

u/Repulsive_Stock9400 13h ago

You're saying that Madison Square Garden is using law firm websites to ban lawyers from events?

Are you sure? Because that sounds pretty stupid...

2

u/20_mile 13h ago

If you don't believe me, just ask these people: https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/the-power-of-exclusion-madison-square-garden-uses-facial-recognition-technology-to-ban-the-owners-enemies/

The ban applies to members of law firms engaged in suing MSG.

2

u/Repulsive_Stock9400 13h ago

Right, that's not a blanket ban on lawyers, that's a very specific group of people who are being excluded for what might be a sketchy reason, but is nothing like you initially described.

-1

u/20_mile 12h ago

but is nothing like you initially described

Exactly as I described, actually.

1

u/Repulsive_Stock9400 12h ago

They're not trolling random law firm websites and banning lawyers for being lawyers, they're using facial recognition to ban lawyers associated with ongoing litigation. That's stupid, but it's not at all what your original comment portrayed.

1

u/20_mile 12h ago

but it's not at all what your original comment portrayed.

You misunderstood.

1

u/Repulsive_Stock9400 12h ago

Okay, boss, thanks for the insight.