r/worldnews • u/BarbaricOklahoma • 10h ago
'The Falklands are Argentinian,' declares Milei
https://news.sky.com/story/falkland-islands-latest-argentinian-president-javier-milei-to-make-national-address-after-trump-suggests-us-wouldnt-back-uk-135809436.9k
u/stig1103 10h ago
This did not end well for the Argentinians last time.
2.2k
u/skrutnizer 10h ago
That was dumb. All they had to do was wait until the UK didn't care anymore.
1.3k
u/Whirlpoolcircle56 9h ago
Yeah Britain made large infrastructure investments after the war which doubled their population. They could have wait a while longer and probably got it when almost nobody lived there in a decade or two.
217
u/catdogman5 7h ago
Why would no one live there in a decade?
586
u/Inside-Associate-729 7h ago
Its population has been steadily declining. Not a lot of opportunities for young people. Most go to the UK or elsewhere for university and few ever come back.
→ More replies (2)218
u/code_archeologist 7h ago
Then they discovered oil under the islands...
→ More replies (9)187
u/Medallicat 6h ago
”what, I said uh what now? Oil you say?” Uncle Sam.
→ More replies (8)167
u/ampsuu 6h ago
They are called American Islands now.
→ More replies (4)122
u/nehibu 6h ago
You are joking, but Trump already made hints that he thinks he should control the Falklands
126
u/DapperPainter2371 5h ago
At this point I’m sincerely wondering if “think” is the correct verb
→ More replies (0)26
→ More replies (4)23
→ More replies (29)48
u/hraun 4h ago
Shackleton described life there as “mainly consisting of walks from the cemetery to the abattoir and back”
My brother was stationed there with the Navy a few years ago and said it hasn’t improved much since then.
→ More replies (3)24
u/Standin373 2h ago
My uncle was stationed there said he's never had better peace and quiet on his off days, different strokes for different blokes i guess.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (12)69
u/saxonturner 6h ago
They were in the process of just giving them to the Argentinians before the war, most people knew nothing about them. All the Argentinians had to do was wait.
→ More replies (35)162
u/Fenris_uy 9h ago
They are going to start drilling for oil from the seas around the islands this year. So the UK is going to care for the next 30 years at least.
62
u/RedditPoster05 7h ago
They’ve been caring for years. They immediately leased out fishing right after the war.
→ More replies (6)4
u/Forsaken_Locksmith_9 3h ago
It’s a crown principality I think not a colony
All revenue goes to the Falkland people, not London
53
u/escapedfromhel 6h ago
The UK wasn't particularly bothered beforehand given that there were discussions about selling, leasing wth with the then Argentine Junta which had the bright idea of invading it while the Iron Lady was unpopular. This should be sorted when the Falklanders buy Argentina using all the oil money they'll be earning. Renaming Argentina to Lesser Falklands, of course.
→ More replies (2)88
u/xX609s-hartXx 8h ago
That's one reason why they did it. They thought Britain wouldn't care enough to actually launch a military response.
141
u/Mission_Island_6657 8h ago
No. A politician was in trouble and fell back on trying to bury his troubles behind war. It didn't work out.
87
23
u/Comfortable_Skill298 7h ago
Yeah but they also thought Britain wouldn't care. They obviously wouldn't have done that if they thought Britain would respond since Britain responding became a bigger crisis for the leader than his other troubles.
37
u/RedditPoster05 7h ago
Well unlucky for him thatcher was also dealing with some small unpopularity and the war really helped her out.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)28
u/LogicNeedNotApply 6h ago
Coincidentally, Thatcher also needed something to boost her popularity, and Galtieri goes and does something stupid like declare war.
→ More replies (1)5
u/tdrules 4h ago
And it worked. Michael Foot’s speech on the Falklands was his finest hour.
9
u/RedofPaw 4h ago
It did work. I might not like thatcher, abd indeed many still don't. Burnham for instance.
But I will respect her for defending the people who lived there, and I am sure even Burnham will give her respect for it also.
→ More replies (2)131
u/cruiserman_80 8h ago
A deeply unpopular govt needed a patriotic win right then to distract from domestic issues like out of control inflation and cost of living pressures. Unfortunately for them, the Thatcher govt in the UK was in exactly the same situation and couldn't afford the backlash from losing to Argentina.
It's no different today except it's Iranian and Venezuelan oil and Epstein files.
→ More replies (6)31
73
u/cyanawesome 9h ago
They thought they had 😢
153
u/count023 9h ago
yea, but they jumped the gun, give it another 6 months and thatcher would have sold the falklands off, same as she was doing to all the other british institutions at the time.
→ More replies (3)61
u/Demostravius4 9h ago
Eh. Unclear, the UK gov would still likely have actually asked the islanders.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (12)8
374
u/Gomnanas 9h ago
The Argentinians thought that America would be against the UK sending their military to defend their territory, because mostly America were very against the old colonial powers doing similar in the post ww2 era. But they very much miscalculated how strong the USA-UK alliance was. The USA did kind of try to stop the UK from taking action at the beginning, but they actually ended up supporting the Brits with intel etc. It was a massive political gambit from Argentina.
This time however, I actually could see the USA backing up Argentina...
370
u/Venturis_Ventis 9h ago
I think Milei's bet is that his unending sycophancy of Trump will pay out in that matter. My bet is that he'll be sorely disappointed.
190
u/barbariccomplexity 9h ago
“Congratulations, the US has elected not to interfere in your war with the UK and her other allies!”
→ More replies (1)224
u/sab222 9h ago edited 7h ago
Trump will absolutely support Argentina. By posting mean things about the UK after its over.
Edit also no matter what happens he will claim he stopped or prevented another war.
91
u/Pdx_pops 9h ago edited 8h ago
Don't forget some AI bullshit with capybaras in hats going up against some kind of boiled cabbages
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)18
u/TinyFugue 8h ago
Trump will use support for the UK as a bargaining chip. He'll offer support in exchange for UK supporting a US bid for Greenland.
→ More replies (2)102
u/Neceon 9h ago
I am fairly certain that the UK would still curb stomp Argentina in a fight.
27
→ More replies (13)70
u/zaevilbunny38 9h ago
They would, Argentina hasn't rebuilt it's forces. Plus it has no answer the F-35. They would only know it's around when shit starts to blow up
→ More replies (18)32
u/Imperium_Dragon 8h ago
Even the Eurofighters they have would be more than enough.
26
u/Hail-Hydrate 5h ago
The missile armament the UK's Typhoons use, the Meteor, has a longer range than the radar systems the Argentinian airforce employ in their aircraft.
The policy for the islands by the British since the last war has been to maintain a garrison force large enough to be capable of fighting off an invasion by themselves. If the Argentine military were to try launching an attack again, it would be a massacre.
→ More replies (3)11
→ More replies (2)24
→ More replies (12)15
u/shade-block 8h ago
He doesn't know that loyalty is one sided with the guy. He isn't loyal to his underlings and will throw them under the bus if it's convenient.
161
u/dandorios 9h ago
Verbal support doesnt matter. The US is not going to attack the UK, and Argentina dont have a military capable of taking the Falklands. Its just saber rattling.
→ More replies (1)66
u/got_to_laugh 9h ago
Correct. Argentina was effectively sanctioned in international arms deals by the UK until recently. They only got modern F16 jets a couple years ago and still use the FAL rifle(the SLR the British used before the current SA80 which is about to be replaced).
No way are they mounting an invasion. Their military is very old and outdated at all levels.
23
u/Mistral-Fien 9h ago
Didn't one of their submarines sank with all hands lost almost a decade ago? Do they even have any working ones?
→ More replies (1)60
u/lyonellaughingstorm 8h ago
Buddy they don’t even have a working economy. Working submarines are a fantasy for them
→ More replies (9)34
225
u/Fordmister 9h ago
It doesn't really matter, the Falklands are so tied up in Britains recent cultural memory that any British government is going to defend them like a rabid wild animal.
It doesn't really matter what Trump does or doesn't do, the royal navy and RAF will respond with full force if the islands are actually threatened. Any British government couldn't afford not to. The domestic political pressure alone would be overwhelming.
188
u/TMC_Data 9h ago
British attitude towards the Falklands before 1982 ==> of no geographical or economical value and too much of a diplomatic liability to be worth the effort of keeping them
British attitude towards the Falklands after 1982 ==> none of that matters anymore, we paid for those islands with the blood of our own soldiers and will never let go of them.
→ More replies (6)61
u/das_masterful 7h ago
Exactly this. The UK had quite a few servicemen KIA in the Falklands war. AFAIK they're buried there too. The UK is never going to give them up.
18
u/LesserShambler 4h ago
Add to that footage going out on the evening news of horrifically injured soldiers being carried off burning ships. That’s still a raw memory for that generation.
5
→ More replies (3)27
u/pingmr 8h ago
In 50 years time, it's probably more likely that the Falklands is still part of the UK, compared to... Northern Ireland.
→ More replies (7)11
u/LesserShambler 4h ago
Honestly at this point most English people probably care more about keeping the Falklands than keeping NI in the Union.
→ More replies (6)97
u/KinkyPaddling 9h ago
King Charles will invite the entire Trump family to a royal dinner honoring Trump, and just like that, Trump will direct American forces to support the UK, just like how Reagan allowed American bases to be used as way stations for the Royal Navy.
→ More replies (4)57
u/DocB630 9h ago
The fact that this is beyond plausible and actually probable is horrifying. Play to his vanity and you can play him like a fiddle.
17
u/Imperium_Dragon 8h ago
Yeah he favors the most recent person to gift him something or kiss ass, as seen by the meetings he had with Zelensky and Putin a while back.
→ More replies (1)28
u/Heapifying 9h ago
In argentina it was seen as a desperate attempt to unite the country against a common external enemy.
The government at the time was a military non-democratic junta that ruled with state terrorism, so they needed something to keep it going
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (22)10
u/solataraxia 8h ago
This time however, I actually could see the USA backing up Argentina...
the US over recent months has already changed its tune on the issue which is likely what prompted this statement.
38
41
u/nikolaibk 9h ago
I don't understand why this is news. Literally all argentinian presidents declared the same while on duty. Why is this one special?
→ More replies (2)22
u/cjcs 7h ago
Because Trump has been making comments about potentially not supporting the UK in a conflict. I don’t think that makes conflict all that likely, but it’s certainly likelier than any time in recent history.
→ More replies (1)14
u/Erdosign 9h ago
I'm of the opinion they should have just offered to buy them and pitched it to Thatcher as "shrinking the welfare rolls."
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (48)16
297
u/dafinsrock 9h ago
"Michael, you can't just say you own the Falklands and expect anything to happen."
"I didn't say it. I declared it."
→ More replies (7)
1.6k
u/SomeIdea_UK 9h ago
"It's worth remembering Argentina has never had sovereignty over the Falklands. The British claim predates the country of Argentina."
Fuck off Milei. Fuck off Trump.
→ More replies (229)
4.1k
u/Intentioned-Help-607 10h ago
In the last Falkland referendum, 99.8% of Falklanders voted to remain a British Overseas Territory, with a 92% voter turn out.
That should be the end of it for at least a generation or two.
Fuck Milei and Fuck Trump.
1.1k
u/nevershockasystole 9h ago
Wasn’t it literally one vote that said join Argentina and the guy did it on purpose because he felt that if the result was 100 percent people would claim it was fraudulent?
916
u/Boring_Ad_8763 9h ago
It was 3 people, one person who thought 100% yes would be fraud, another person who wanted an independent Falklands and voted Argentina as a protest, and a 3rd person who has never been identified
425
u/4_max_4 9h ago
third person sounds like an undercover penguin to me
34
u/Ornery_Gate_6847 8h ago
I can believe there's at least one idiot on the island
19
u/wild_card2804 8h ago edited 8h ago
I'd argue two idiots, because how the hell do you expect to become independent as a small island in the south atlantic and maintain any semblance of economic security.
Edit: Geography
→ More replies (2)11
u/Captain_d00m 8h ago
Even still, only two idiots? I see two idiots every morning when I look in the mirror (double vision)
68
→ More replies (2)11
u/GoodOldSlippinJimmy 8h ago
That's ridiculous. 3 penguins in a trenchcoat is a much more likely scenario.
59
u/mo140 9h ago
Just to clarify, the vote against UK rule wasn't necessarily a vote for Argentina. The referendum was whether or not to stay under British rule, not whether or not to join Argentina
You are right about the first 2. The third guy ive only heard rumours about, one being that he did it as a joke to wind up his wife, the other being that he misunderstood the question
→ More replies (2)36
u/MilesSebastian 8h ago
If my screw up of a vote became a source of international speculation, I'd keep very quiet about it.
→ More replies (1)88
u/sammyslug13 9h ago
Lol what if the 3rd person just fucked up their ballot and has been to embarrassed to admit it
39
u/Everestkid 9h ago
There was an invalid ballot where someone both ticked "yes" and crossed "no." The intent was clearly for "yes," but the directions clearly stated to only mark one option.
There was also a blank ballot.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)20
22
→ More replies (8)9
u/Zestyclose-End-6622 9h ago
I've heard that the third guy was apparently voting to spite his wife but I cannot find anything to support that claim.
89
u/Additional_Meeting_2 6h ago
Argentina doesn’t even have good historical claim to the islands. They are just close to Argentina
72
u/_MooFreaky_ 6h ago
Their claim is essentially the same as Trump's with Greenland. It's nearby and I want it.
12
→ More replies (5)22
108
→ More replies (150)39
u/Kundrew1 9h ago
Isn't the vast majority of the Falkland population of British descent?
→ More replies (12)53
u/advocatus_diabolii 5h ago
There is no native population, it was uninhabited when Europeans arrived. The French and English both settled around the same time (1765 and 1766) without realizing each other was there. Then the Spanish took over from the French and fought with the English for control until the Napoleonic Wars when both withdrew. The English returned in 1833.
→ More replies (5)
952
u/DieAnotherDay1985 10h ago
While the UK isn't as mighty as they once were I would assume they would still smack Argentina around.
439
9h ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (6)112
u/BrotherEstapol 8h ago
It would be nice to see some Argentines calling out this for what it is; a populist trying to distract the electorate. It's not a viable option to try and take the Falklands, and it would be a disaster if they tried.
64
→ More replies (4)32
u/wellwood_allgood 7h ago
You got as much chance of that happening as getting Russians to criticise Putin. It's not in their nature.
→ More replies (1)220
u/hawkseye17 9h ago
Does Argentina even have a navy anymore that isn't a bunch of rusty old boats?
227
u/statcaffeinebolus 9h ago
the Argentinian military is absolutely dismal.
87
u/PembyVillageIdiot 8h ago
The uk rightfully gets a lot of flack for the state of its general military. But they have some very valuable eggs in a few small baskets still. The Argentina military doesn’t even have baskets to put the eggs they don’t have into anymore
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (6)93
u/nomad-mr_t 9h ago
Milei has licked Trump's boots so thoroughly that he likely expects the US to support his claim before the midterms.
→ More replies (17)36
317
u/hellranger788 10h ago
Plus pretty sure the island has gotten alot more teeth added to it.
82
u/CHawkeye 4h ago
In 1982, the Argentinian navy and army was poor but of some size to do the falklands and the British had barely any military presence on the island
Today, the Argentine military is even worse, and the British have a significant advancement in technology, and a military base with permanent eurofighter jet deployment there, a military garrison and a sky sabre air defence network which is publicly known of. (There will be other stuff).
It would not end well for Argentina (again)
→ More replies (1)27
u/stevew14 3h ago
There is also a decent chance that a submarine is in the area.
18
u/Beer-Milkshakes 3h ago
There are constantly British Navy in the Caribbean so yeah, good chance.
→ More replies (1)126
u/statcaffeinebolus 9h ago
the British military presence in the Falklands is more significant now than it was then. the only way Argentina is getting the Falklands is if the US provides direct military assistance.
→ More replies (20)18
u/AI_moderated_failure 8h ago
I'm not sure Argentina could even afford the fuel to go there, so, yes.
11
u/filipv 2h ago edited 2h ago
One could argue the UK, as far as the amount and quality of kit it can bring, is mightier than it was the last time Argentina tried to take the Falklands.
They now have super-modern carriers, AWACSes, fancy subs, the Harriers were replaced by stealthy F-35s, there are long-legged superfast Typhoon interceptors stationed there... I'd argue that today the UK could defeat Argentine much more quickly and painlessly.
Britain doesn't need to recreate the 1982 campaign at all. The permanent Typhoon presence, modern radar, SAMs, naval forces, SSNs, intelligence and long-range airlift mean Argentina would have a much harder time achieving the initial surprise and local air superiority that made the 1982 invasion possible in the first place.
→ More replies (48)35
u/goatman72 8h ago
They are far more powerful than in 1982. It would be an absolute massacre. Argentina wouldn’t even be able to get anywhere near the islands.
→ More replies (7)
836
u/IncoherentMutterer 10h ago
Just for that Argentina now belongs to the Falklands.
117
22
→ More replies (9)19
127
1.1k
u/Software_Dependent 10h ago
"Milei begins his statement by clearly outlining his view on the Falkland Islands, insisting the territory is Argentinean.
"The Falklands are Argentinean. Historically and legally. There can be no argument. They are part of the Argentine territory," he says. "
"Historically and legally."
No they weren't ever.
"There can be no argument"
There was, and you lost. What is wrong with these idiots?
348
u/BungholeBilbo69 9h ago
Lmao what history could he possible be referring to?? That territory has never, ever been a part of Argentina. That statement is absolutely baffling
→ More replies (61)55
u/xternocleidomastoide 7h ago
It is part of the Argentine government playbook: when domestic policy goes to shit, manufacture nationalist fervor around either (a) their soccer team or (b) resurrect the specter of the Falklands or (c) increase tension with Chile or Brazil.
Argentina’s economy basically collapsed, their currency is practically worthless, and since Plan A didn't go well at this World Cup, Milei is predictably reaching for Plan B and Plan C.
A lot of conditions seem reminiscent of the right wing military dictatorship, the junta exploited the 78 World Cup (which they likely bought) as a nationalist spectacle while the country’s economic and social conditions deteriorated. By 82, things had become so bad that they launched a half assed invasion of the Falklands in an attempt to recover domestic legitimacy.
The present circumstances are obviously not identical, but the political reflex is remarkably similar: when domestic credibility evaporates, distract the public with sports or manufacture unity around an external dispute. Milei's government is also raisin territorial disputes with Chile currently as well.
Honestly, Argentina has been managed so catastrophically for nearly a century that its continued existence as a functioning country almost qualifies as a miracle.
→ More replies (3)47
u/Antique_Eye_3200 9h ago
Fake it till you make it. It’s worked brilliantly for Trump, so Milei figures he might as well give it a shot.
13
u/OozeNAahz 8h ago
I mean we have Trump that demands Greenland because “fuck you that’s why”. Not to mention Canada, and evidently the Straight of Hormuz now? Which the last he wants to rename because he can’t remember the name of it.
3
u/wufnu 7h ago
My understanding is that they whip this issue out when they need to drum up support after a bunch of fails.
8
u/ludicrous_socks 6h ago
A good barometre for the health of the Argentine economy is how much their leaders are bleating about the Falklands
Lots of "los malvinas son Argentina" = bad news for the peso
→ More replies (15)68
u/colepercy120 9h ago
Nationalists be nationalists, and theoretically the islands were Argentine for a few months in 1832 and 33, after the british abandoned them, but the modern population is entirely british.
→ More replies (10)80
u/Yuukiko_ 9h ago
Weren't the Falklands never populated in the first place before the British got there?
55
u/colepercy120 9h ago
Yes, but the british never populated them either, they just dropped a plaque saying it was theres and left. The first people to actually colonize it were the French, who then gave it to the Spanish as part of a treaty, then britian tried to settle it but pulled out due to strain from the american revolution.
Following the war the Spanish Empire collapsed and pulled their people there back to Uruguay and the islands were mainly populated by american whalers, then the newly declared Argentina came in and seized the islands to regulate the Americans, which britian got mad at and then seized the islands.
Really the islands have been passed around so many times that practically every power in the region at one point controlled them and could make a claim to them, britian was just the most recent
22
39
u/Everestkid 9h ago
There are also claims from the Argentines that the British expelled those on the islands. This is a lie; there is written proof that the Brits never did so.
→ More replies (5)11
u/ricky_clarkson 6h ago
The Brits expelled the Argentine military, but allowed civilians to choose whether to remain.
457
u/raven1121 10h ago
Soo im guessing the Argentinian economy is especially shit this quarter?
88
47
u/Betta_Check_Yosef 9h ago
Well, Messi was the best thing they had going, and he just retired. So, yeah, shit is pretty bleak for them right now
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (17)13
92
44
u/Zadiath 9h ago
He didn't gave a fuck about the islands before he was elected, said that we lost them in the war and admired Tatcher. This is a political nothing burger.
→ More replies (2)
172
u/Dragonfly_pin 10h ago
I remember when he said he respected Margaret Thatcher and would never question the British on the Falkland Islands.
And so lots of right-wing British people were loudly fans of his, supported him and thought he was going to be amazing.
From the people who brought you Brexit, another amazing success.
→ More replies (6)39
u/BungholeBilbo69 9h ago
Funny how shit changes once their economy took a nosedive and he needed to redirect their anger to someone else lol
→ More replies (6)
317
u/CharlieW74 10h ago
Don't make us tell you again that they aren't
→ More replies (22)95
u/PrestondeTipp 10h ago
He could also ask all the people who live there, who, during referendums, overwhelming vote in favour of remaining in the UK
→ More replies (1)56
u/CharlieW74 10h ago
He, and the Argentinian people know the answer to this, doesn't matter to them. Time is ripe for him to regurgitate this crap, since the orange prick in the white house is stirring shit up.
Well done maga.
→ More replies (4)
46
u/CliffBiffington 8h ago
Trump proved you can just say something is yours and google and apple will allow it.
→ More replies (2)
43
u/launchedsquid 7h ago
How to know when Argentina's economy is terrible, they start talking about the Falklands.
→ More replies (1)
28
u/UnsavoryBiscuit 5h ago
Wasn't the Falklands a British territory before Argentina was even a country? :/
→ More replies (5)12
u/AlanPartrid 4h ago
yes the whole thing is absolutely fucking absurd. embarrassing stuff but that's argentina for you
12
10
u/Conscious_Quality803 3h ago
There's only three reasons Milei would day this: the Argentinian economy is about to tank hard, Trump has decided the UK is his next target after Canada, or Milei has gone completely insane. Most likely it's all three.
→ More replies (1)
48
u/Ok-Currency1593 9h ago
Despite Argentinian's not living there?
→ More replies (9)46
u/lyonellaughingstorm 7h ago
*Despite Argentinians never having lived there aside from a brief, illegal settlement
→ More replies (9)
24
39
u/nonoanddefinitelyno 10h ago
"The Cayman Islands are nonoanddefinitelynos,", declares nonoanddefinitelyno.
16
u/Ewan_Oozarmy 8h ago
Britain laid claim to the Falkland Islands in 1690. Argentina didn’t exist until 1816
→ More replies (1)
28
41
u/spiraldive87 8h ago
As an Irish guy I really, really don’t want to be aligning with the Brits on territorial disputes but the Argentinians are forcing me into that predicament.
This shit is so fucking dumb and it’s insane how many otherwise rational Argentinians think this kind of nonsense. When you’re there it’s mad how prevalent this gripe is in their head. Definition of living rent free.
34
→ More replies (5)4
14
u/Difficult_Survey5063 9h ago
Ah yes, I’m sure the minuscule horribly outdated Argentine navy and Air Force stand a chance against the comparatively large, modern, and well equipped Royal Navy and RAF.
I’m sure those Astute class fleet submarines alone would love to engage some nice easy targets in any attempted invasion.
→ More replies (8)
11
u/One-Bird-8961 7h ago
Didn't win the world cup, start a war. Another stupid world leader.
→ More replies (3)
27
u/Hempy2013 9h ago
Of all the bullshit colonial shenanigans that went down the last few centuries the Falklands are the least problematic. Before Europeans settled those rocks it was only inhabited by Penguins.
Now if the Penguins start having a problem with the status quo we can talk, until then they seem content doing Penguin shit.
→ More replies (1)7
u/BlunanNation 2h ago
The Penguins actually are quite content with the current arrangements they have. The areas of the Falklands they inhabit are conservation areas and they are a protected species.
I can assume they would like things to remain unchanged.
14
u/Caltastrophe 9h ago
They say this all the time because it rallies the Argentian nationalists to their vote.
Invading the Falklands would be an insane and brain dead move on Argentina's part, and it'd go about as well as it did last time (which is to say: not well at all).
→ More replies (5)
10
u/Illustrious-Wave-794 7h ago
If Argentina tries to take the falklands again, this time the UK should do an uno reverse and just take Argentina. I’d have a giggle at that.
→ More replies (2)6
6
u/Important-Today4119 6h ago
Not even those that live there want to be argentinian lmao
→ More replies (1)
6
u/RaiseWide5460 4h ago
Ummm . . . I believe if Meili bothers to check he will find that someone said that to the British a few years ago and the British disagreed. Rather energetically.
→ More replies (1)
22
21
u/bankybanker 8h ago
This is to draw the UK into a war with Argentina over the faulklands so it weakens their ability to defend against an attack from Russia. Trump is doing Russias biding against one of our strongest allies… I’m ashamed and disgusted
→ More replies (10)15
u/KataqNarayan 5h ago
Don’t worry, the UKs garrison and 4 euro fighter jets stationed on the islands are currently enough to handle anything the argies can send.
6
5
u/mohosa63224 6h ago
Didn't the people of the Falklands overwhelmingly vote in a referendum in 2013 to remain a British Overseas Territory?
→ More replies (1)
44
u/huseynli 10h ago
Why do Argentinians even care about Falklands? They have patagonia, the most beautiful place on earth and they are selling it...
→ More replies (21)
3.6k
u/Stargost_ 8h ago
There's a funny pattern here where you can directly correlate the state of our economy with how much the president is talking about those islands. The more they talk about it, the worse we are.