r/worldnews 16h ago

Prime Minister Carney announces the largest investment in VIA Rail’s history to bring passenger rail car manufacturing back to Canada

https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-releases/2026/09/03/prime-minister-carney-announces-largest-investment-rails-history
5.8k Upvotes

314 comments sorted by

1.6k

u/informavore 16h ago

Great news and about time we started really developing our rail infrastructure.

398

u/InformalYesterday760 15h ago

Next up, announce that the same plants will get contracts for the HS rail cars for the HSR rail project

Watch Canada get good at producing HSR to typical North American standards, and for northern climates.

Cut to 2040 and we're helping US build a HSR from Boston to NYC to Philadelphia.

84

u/HeadofR3d 15h ago

Do you have any thoughts on how we avoid the Ottawa LRT fiasco? Would on shoring manufacturing help solve the design and construction issues?

129

u/InformalYesterday760 15h ago

The unfortunate reality is that when you're doing something new, expect the earlier iterations to be a learning experience.

But the important thing to remember is that we do learn from the projects, and each subsequent project goes better and better. Montreal REM benefited from some engineers moving from Ottawa lrt and bringing their recent experience. Ottawa phase 2 is going better than phase 1. If Ottawa did phase 3 I predict it'll go smoother still.

With LRT you'd hear folks yelling "why didn't we just hire the experts that do this in Europe" and then you find out they did, but that introduces problems cause things are done to different standards in different parts of the world. Some consulting engineer sees we are using track standard X and thinks "that's what we use every day, cool" when they should have known "they are using a different rail type here, so my standard has to change".

So you hire foreign expertise and there will be misses as some electrical engineer from Europe forgets that we do 60 Hz compared to their 50 Hz.

Or you hire locals and they have never done HSR before.

Or you hire both, acknowledge that the first one is where we learn a lot, and that the second leg will be better. And the 3rd better still.

49

u/Solarisphere 15h ago

Can confirm. I'm a consulting engineer working with Europeans on a Canadian project, and dealing with the teething difficulties of them adapting to local standards, budgets, and expectations.

4

u/stenuo 12h ago

Local Standards make sense, but could you please expand on what differs so drastically with Europe's when it comes to budgets and expectations in your experience?

11

u/InformalYesterday760 10h ago

Not who you're asking, but international engineering can run into all sorts of fun challenges

Fabrication methodologies common in one part of the world may be entirely uncommon somewhere else.

And this relates to the fact that the supply chains are so different. At one point ould get a part made in NA in 2 days for 1000 dollars, but struggle to get it made in EU in 2 weeks for 3000 euros cause I just didn't have those same relationships with suppliers.

And then there can be differences in quality processes and documentation. An EU supplier may understand more fully why I need material records for this bolt all the way back to the raw steel from the mill - a supplier in Cambodia may struggle with this (for example).

And then there are differences in work cultures, holidays - don't plan to get much done July/ August in EU cause lots of their teams will be off (to be clear, this is what more people should have)

7

u/spaceman1055 11h ago

I think it really boils down to standards. Possibly being accustomed to different software and manufacturers too, though I imagine the standards difference explains most of the challenges.

Like being more accustomed to Siemens than Rockwell for controls techologies. Both exist in North America, but Rockwell dominates in NA and if you only know Siemens as a European, you'll have to adapt. You'll be able too but it'll take some time.

Standards if you are accustomed to the same standard, reinforced over thousands of projects hours, a simple assumption you use to make with the European standards may no longer hold in North America, even if it seems nominal at first.

14

u/Exotic_Release2979 12h ago

Using government money to help the citizens. Novel approach. Yay Canada.

4

u/electrodog1999 11h ago

As a former residential electrician who used to do a lot of mansions there is definitely a learning curve doing something new. Every new house would have 15 lights that were $1500 a piece and the first one would take a day to figure out how it went together and by the last one it was done in 25 minutes.

9

u/_John_Dillinger 15h ago

i could be convinced to move to canada for this. it really wouldn't take much

9

u/theconceptofcanada 12h ago

We would welcome you. Come to my beautiful province of British Columbia. Integrate. Enjoy the fact that you don't have to worry about people bringing firearms with them to "feel safe" when going to restaurants, movie theatres and shopping malls.

7

u/ballisticks 11h ago

British Columbia.

Bring Cash tho

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Neither-Addition1081 12h ago

It's definitely a big move for improving infrastructure and jobs in Canada. Plus, who wouldn't want to enjoy that scenic train ride?

2

u/ballisticks 11h ago

I'm sure we'll hear much whining from the right once they figure out their talking points on why this is bad.

5

u/hellswaters 14h ago

This is also a great example of how to support industry during tough times. Yeah it's a 4.7 billion dollar price tag. But it also hires a bunch of people to build and maintain them, who pay taxes. Then using Canadian resources, that supports people in those industries.

There might be cheaper, or maybe every so slightly quicker options, but doing it domestically can have very long term impacts. Especially if there are other rail projects on the horizon that can further grow a new industry.

4

u/LittleGreenSoldier 9h ago

Canadian steel and lumber for rails. Canadian workers to build it. Canadian steel and aluminum for the trains. If they really do invest the cost locally, this will give us a massive boost for years.

→ More replies (5)

17

u/alliusis 15h ago edited 14h ago

Ottawa LRT fiasco started with corruption in the bidding process to SNCL, where iirc "someone" in the municipality declined to go with one of the three vendors who passed the technical evaluation and instead chose SNCL, who failed the technical and had an exceptionally poor and vague application. So lots of eyes on the bidding and acquisition process would help, as a start. 

Still lots of places for things to go sideways, and yeah sure when doing something new there will be failures and that is absolutely not a reason to not try and do something new. But the Ottawa LRT was a special kind of screwy right from the start, and seriously don't let anyone else tell you otherwise. If we'd gone with one of the competent vendors I'd like to imagine we'd have paid less for a better product. 

3

u/Jayelle9 14h ago

Spot on!

23

u/West_to_East 15h ago

Ottawa's LRT issues come from a variety of things.

A big one is the demand to special cars that have never been used before, basically Ottawa was the beta test.

It was also a dumb fucking P3 which are often TERRIBLE as the politicians involved dont want to hold the private sector partners accountable and the people get fleeced.

Ol'Watson literally said Ottawa will have a Chevy and not a Cadillac and got into the fact that it won't be nice but it will be cheap.

Basically, we need to fund public infrastructure properly and build it continuously to keep expertise around. Simple as.

2

u/Cruciblelfg123 11h ago

The design there was just an absolute failure of communication and planning. They designed the tracks for one type of car and then designed new cars without considering the track they would have to run on, while simultaneously deciding they would run across military land apparently without consulting the military (or maybe it was land near to military land but that cannot be blocked in case of emergency I can’t remember at this point)

They could have manufactured them right in Ottawa and it wouldn’t have helped if nobody had the brainpower to check the turning radius of the cars vs the turns of the existing track

u/thecanaryisdead2099 18m ago

Easy. You don't leave the final technical design solution in the hands of incompetent city council. The report said that heavy rail requirements didn't match the light rail design but it was green lit. Zero accountability didn't help either.

3

u/Blackhawk510 11h ago

To be fair, "north American standards" for HSR aren't a high bar to clear - Amtrak's Northeast corridor does things pretty well "by North American standards", but because the NEC is so heavily surrounded by very dense and old population centers, it's nigh impossible to rebuild the rail lines to actually handle the speeds the Acela trainsets are meant to be capable of. At least, not without tearing down hundreds of buildings and displacing thousands.

2

u/platypus_boi 11h ago

Sounds like my kinda wet dream.

4

u/mightocondreas 15h ago

Wow, you have a great imagination!

11

u/InformalYesterday760 15h ago

Doesn't take much imagination to note the benefits of becoming a modern HSR powerhouse could be in North America

→ More replies (2)

2

u/GunTotinPenguin 11h ago

It’s cute you think the US would ever invest in anything to make life more convenient for us citizens

1

u/[deleted] 8h ago

[deleted]

1

u/InformalYesterday760 8h ago

I mean

That's why man invented this really insane new piece of tech... A fence

Fence, overpasses to let wildlife through and follow alongside routes like major highways which already disrupt wildlife so we don't interrupt them further

I jest a bit, but this isn't too hard to solve

1

u/obitarian 6h ago

Why would we help them? We're ripping them off, remember? There's nothing they need from us, remember?

The USA can fuck right off, and keep on fucking right off.

1

u/Clessiah 6h ago

As long as US doesn’t pull another Bombardier.

→ More replies (2)

105

u/Ehis4Adam 15h ago

It's a great day for Canada, and therefore the world.

46

u/Soulfulkira 15h ago

As is tradition.

30

u/zacyzacy 15h ago

I love to hear this, genuinely, but at the same time it's a joke that we don't already have high speed rail. We let ourselves fall behind the rest of the developed world to be more like America. But baby steps in the right direction is still the right direction.

1

u/Positronic_Matrix 4h ago

Fingers crossed that Toronto brings back bike lanes.

1

u/Miserable_Warthog_42 10h ago

True, but canada also has the biggest transit problem on the entire world: the population is spread so thin from one end to the other, rail is probably the most expensive to service our population properly. But yes, im all for a good transit if possible

→ More replies (5)

16

u/BigPlunk 13h ago

I would LOVE to take a coast-to-coast-to-coast rail trip to every province and territory. It's something I've wanted to do most of my life. I love seeing this news.

3

u/Ok_Material9377 5h ago

I'd like it if the Federal government subsidized ferries fares in BC like they do in Atlantic Canada

→ More replies (3)

3

u/thephantom1492 4h ago

Maybe it will also work better than the REM...

→ More replies (9)

451

u/fraggle_captain 15h ago

The Prime Minister, Mark Carney, announced that, for the first time in four decades, VIA Rail passenger cars will be built in Canada. The federal government is investing more than $4.7 billion for VIA Rail to acquire and maintain 313 new passenger rail cars from Alstom Canada. The cars will be manufactured and assembled in Thunder Bay, Ontario, and La Pocatière, Québec, with design and engineering work taking place in Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville, Québec.

That's amazing, but $4.7 billion for 313 passenger railcars. A touch over $15 million each. I never would have realized they are that expensive!

271

u/TheAeroDalton 15h ago

the cost most likely involves building new manufacturing centers for them to get built. once the 313 are made, they could just pivot to make something else

also, manufacturing is expensive

101

u/totallyclocks 15h ago

Both manufacturering facilities already exist and already build street cars and subway cars for the TTC in Toronto.

But this contract does include maintenance for the service life of the rail car , so that’s probably where the $15 figure comes from.

28

u/GullibleDetective 14h ago

Depends if the facility needs any upgrades/modernizing too

7

u/Much-Neighborhood171 10h ago

They are also are building cars for Vancouver's SkyTrain and Montreal's REM. 

24

u/fraggle_captain 15h ago

I think another part of it that I'm missing is the maintenance piece (they are paying for purchase and ongoing maintenance). If that's over ten years maintenance could be just as much as the purchase price. (According to my quick ChatGPT search - I am certainly no railcar manufacturing expert).

6

u/_John_Dillinger 15h ago

idk about hsr, but train components are generally built for 20 year duty cycles.

5

u/Much-Neighborhood171 10h ago

The cars that are being replaced are up to 72 years old. 

2

u/_John_Dillinger 10h ago

i get that. the cars have ablative components like side bearings and draft gears that go out way sooner

2

u/Much-Neighborhood171 10h ago

Probably way sooner than 20 years. I'm more amazed that VIA has kept the old Budds running for so long.

1

u/_John_Dillinger 10h ago

eh, depends on what kind theyre rockin, and what sort of usage they get put through. i know canadas bill for both tends to be higher because of the temp stress they get (less the cold, more the frequent flame baths...)

2

u/Much-Neighborhood171 10h ago

I meant that the wearing components would need replacing earlier. I'm sure they could make the cars last longer with proper maintenance.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/No_Magician5266 10h ago

This simply isn’t true. A broad example is truck rebuilds which are mileage based with major rebuilds happening roughly every 5 years for freight. VIA follows a fairly regimented preventative maintenance program provided by Siemens for the Venture fleet with various components and systems, with different things on different schedules. Water filtration for example could be on a 3 month schedule vs various air brake components that are replaced on an annual basis.

In the industry, this service provided by the manufacturer is called TSSSA (Technical Support and Spare Supply Agreement) and is baked into the total cost. Siemens provides it with Venture fleet, Stadler will provide it with the new locos, and Alstom will undoubtedly provided it with the cars.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/fat_chemist 15h ago

Opportunities to export …

1

u/Reptillian97 6h ago

And of course chat gpt would be the authority on this information...

2

u/Agitated-Vanilla-763 11h ago

The manufacturing facilities have been there for more than 50 years. The first bilevel cars as well as the first mr73 cars came out of both of these same factories.

→ More replies (4)

20

u/Realtrain 14h ago

Side Note, but I've always thought Thunder Bay is such a badass name.

12

u/jert3 13h ago

You should totally move there it is really bad ass. Like Mad Max sort of.

5

u/Rockterrace 12h ago

The weird thing is there’s not really that many thunderstorms there.

13

u/MAHHockey 15h ago

That's $4.7bil CAD. A little cheaper when you look at it in USD ($3.41bil)

For a rough comparison, the Amtrak Airo trainset order (83 trains consisting of 563 cars and 77 locomotives) ran around $8bil USD.

14

u/Superduperbals 15h ago

Definitely worth investing in domestic production in the long run, if we have any hope of catching up to the rest of the world in terms of high-speed rail development it would be a shame to remain import dependent.

19

u/cardew-vascular 15h ago

It's also adding infrastructure for building them, not just the cars themselves but if they last 70+ years that doesn't seem like such a big deal. Plus I'm hoping we get a new series of passenger rail investments in the country.

4

u/three_crystals 9h ago

Building the infrastructure and keeping the talent in Canada is key. That is the real key for maintaining public infrastructure long term.

Really glad to see this announcement!

1

u/liguinii 11h ago

They are not really meant to last that long, even if we keep them that long.

5

u/drae- 14h ago

I haven't read the article yet, but generally these types of contracts include maintenance agreements. These types of agreements are often half (or more) of the actual purchase price.

Edit: of course now I see that in other comments below. Cheers!

3

u/MenacingGummy 14h ago

They included the wording build & maintain so I wonder if there is some maintenance funding for a set period.

1

u/BrovaloneSandwich 9h ago

Yeah a preventive maintenance contract exists long after the product is finished and is generally where the bulk of expense goes 💪

2

u/_John_Dillinger 15h ago

they aren't. the rails however are

1

u/BrovaloneSandwich 9h ago

It includes maintenance! Preventive maintenance are long contracts

1

u/nav13eh 9h ago

They are probably a tad overpriced, but rail equipment has a long lifetime.

1

u/Devils_Advocate6_6_6 14h ago

I'm IMMENSELY concerned that Alstom is designing the railcars. Those smooth brained mouth breathers couldn't find their way out of a paper bag.

→ More replies (4)

78

u/Sensitivevirmin 16h ago

It never should have left but it’s good to have it back.

13

u/jyeatbvg 11h ago

We desperately need to start bringing other industries in-house. Can’t keep relying on certain third parties that could become unreliable at the drop of a hat.

188

u/Failedmusician87 16h ago

Maybe we can also make transit by rail more affordable while we're at it?

27

u/F1shermanIvan 15h ago

Montreal to Ottawa in the train was under $100 and took an hour and a half last week.

How affordable should intercity trains be, because they’re not public transit like a subway is. They’re airlines on rails.

The Shinkansen between Tokyo and Osaka is more expensive than flying between those cities.

14

u/Infamous-Mixture-605 13h ago

 Montreal to Ottawa in the train was under $100 and took an hour and a half last week.

And if you buy it well in advance it's a lot cheaper.

I'm travelling from Montreal to Ottawa next week on Via.  I bought my ticket at the end of July and it was around $50.

1

u/cardew-vascular 3h ago

Train service like that doesn't really exist on the west coast. I can't take the train to Whistler or Kelowna from Vancouver. There really should be passenger rail from Vancouver to Whistler at least.

The only real local passenger rail we have goes to the states and 8 hrs and $200. For 100$ more you can save 6.5 hours.

66

u/mrcoolio 15h ago

Transit by rail is actually pretty affordable - especially when compared to air. It's my favourite way to travel by far between Montreal and Toronto and everything in between.

Driving from Ottawa to Toronto is about $50 in gas alone, nevermind the wear on your vehicle.
A train ticket is $55 so long as you aren't looking at last minute. Not sure what more you want.

You can't compare prices to Europe because you could pass through two countries in the time you've gone from Ottawa to Toronto. It's apples to oranges. Both fruit but very different.

99

u/swabbie 15h ago edited 15h ago

Cries from west coast...

Ticket from Vancouver to Kamloops is over $100 and only runs twice a week.

No affordable train to get to Calgary by rail, but discount flights are ~$105-130

Rocky Mountaineer premium train has packages starting at $2500 and jump as high as $15k.

Damn mountains. Damn beautiful majestic mountains.

38

u/twattewaffle 15h ago

Cries from Vancouver Island...our rail line hasn't been used in over 15 years.

That said, I'm still very happy for the investment and benefits it brings Canadians, and I look forward to one day doing a cross Canada rail trip!

9

u/Jasonfunk8 14h ago

First thing I though when I saw this was our neglected rail on Van Isle

15

u/TheLostSkellyton 14h ago

The cheapest possible tickets on off dates no one wants to travel on to take Via Rail from Edmonton to Vancouver start at $600 round trip, and the trip takes over 24h each way because the track is owned by freight companies so the Via train has to stop and wait for the freight trains to take precedence at multiple points along the trip. The only way it makes any sense to travel by train nowdays is if you have an insurmountable fear of flying.

It breaks my heart, because I have fond memories of the freedom I got through train travel as a student. The 8hr trip from Montreal to Toronto was perfect for me—safe, comfortable, didn't break the bank, got me from home to college and back to visit very easily. I would love to see Via Rail make a comeback as a viable mode of travel, but I don't see how that's possible without the government either intervening to do track buybacks or build a lot of new tracks. 

13

u/Big_Knife_SK 14h ago

It's not the mountains. It's the same shit service across the prairies, too. I'd love to have functional rail travel from Saskatoon to Edmonton, Calgary or Winnipeg.

9

u/Kingofcheeses 14h ago

I always wave to the Rocky Mountaineer passengers when they pass by my house

4

u/swabbie 13h ago

So do we. We're up on an apartment building overlooking the Fraiser River and the tracks. My wifes' a serial train waver and had car-fulls waving back through their glass ceiling back to us.

1

u/rikayla 10h ago

omg, that's super adorable. 💖

→ More replies (1)

3

u/J-Bizzle82 13h ago

I want cross country HSR so bad!

4

u/F1shermanIvan 13h ago

Well of course. Vancouver to Kamloops is 350 kms or so, and ends with a city of less than 130,000 people.

Rail is only really viable when the population can support it, and outside of the Toronto to Montreal corridor, Canada doesn’t have a dense population at ALL.

A daily service to a place like Kamloops would never even be remotely feasible because people just wouldn’t use it.

7

u/swabbie 13h ago edited 13h ago

Point is it's the first and only major stop for commuter travel before going across Canada and we only get two trains a week. We have 5.5 million people in BC and no real commuter train travel... anywhere (except inner-Vancouver skytrain).

We used to have many more rail options including smaller 50k-150k cities, but cheaper air has taken over. Even inter-city bus service has mostly collapsed.

2

u/F1shermanIvan 13h ago

Yeah, because you have cheaper, faster air service.

Nobody is gonna run a train into cities when nobody is on it. And nobody is on it because it’s been supplanted by air travel. You can argue the fact that air travel is inconvenient with security and all that, but Canada is a big, wide open, extremely sparsely populated country for the most part.

It’s hard to justify big long distance permanent railways for passengers outside the Toronto-Montreal corridor because nobody lives there. Railways in other countries rely on density to be viable, and Canada doesn’t have that much.

3

u/ana_log_ue 12h ago

Russia is also a big wide open sparsely populated country, and its passenger rail network dwarfs Canada’s. Investing in air travel over rail travel is a policy choice. I’m hoping this government announcement is the beginning of the shift toward prioritizing more passenger rail travel.

18

u/Hawco 15h ago

It’s often cheaper to fly to a province or two over than taking the train there, provided you aim for lowest cost ticket. Plus, there’s all the time saved from flying; however, the train will always be less stressful and more comfortable than flying. VIA Rail typically offers a 10-15% discount on Tuesdays too, but it still doesn’t beat cheap airfare. 

10

u/mrcoolio 15h ago

It’s 2100 km from Ottawa to Winnipeg, just the next province over.

It’s 1800 km from Barcelona to Berlin.

Lmao

2

u/Hawco 15h ago

Yes, so adjust according to the region’s geographic reality, but often flights will still be faster and cheaper. 

7

u/mrcoolio 15h ago

It’s about 3 hours to fly Ottawa to Winnipeg or 30 hours by rail. And you are surprised rail is more expensive? Prices go by how long companies need to take care of you not how long you’re inconvenienced for.

Until we get some sort of Japanese bullet train, taking rail from province to province just doesn’t really make sense for anything other than a long joy ride. But within shorter spans I really do believe there is a lot of potential there to be expanded upon.

2

u/happyscrappy 13h ago

I agree there's a big part of that. If you think of it 30 hours means you have to include some part of a stay in the cost. Like a hotel room although coach seat is obviously not as nice as a hotel room.

This applies to land but definitely more to sea. If you take a ship across the Atlantic of course it's going to cost more. They have to tend to you for two days and feed you a couple times. It's just going to cost more, no two ways about it.

It is a bummer.

1

u/Hawco 15h ago

I didn’t say I’m surprised, and it would be great if VIA Rail had lower prices, so maybe this development will affect that change. 

5

u/sportow 15h ago

Kids were free on Via Rail this summer. We did Toronto to Quebec City. Super relaxing.

3

u/Onironius 13h ago

What I want is for it to be cheaper than flying for any distance closer than one city over.

Flight from Vancouver to Edmonton- $162, 1.5 hours

Train from Vancouver to Edmonton- $280, 1 day

Almost 2x the cost, taking 16x the time.

2

u/mrcoolio 11h ago

It’s priced on how long you’re using the service and they’re taking care of you. Not on how much it’s inconveniently long, unfortunately. Find me another example of something that is 16x more for only 2x more money lmao.

2

u/o-rama 13h ago

I beg to differ - two years ago I booked a train from southwestern Ontario to Montreal for $550. Doesn’t feel very affordable. 

5

u/mrcoolio 11h ago

Was it the week before?

4

u/TheWardenShadowsong 15h ago

During ilesoniq at least it was cheaper to fly from toronto to montreal than take the train, imo that should never be the case

2

u/conanap 12h ago

Idk dude, back in 2019, I had mil discount, and the train ticket from Oshawa to Ottawa still ran me a good 197$ one way. I just checked and see some at around 130$ before discount, but that’s cutting it pretty close to plane tickets.

1

u/Lambs2Lions_ 10h ago

This is a lie. And a weird one at that.

On average they’re $80 one way. $20 for luggage. $200 for 9 hours on a train in the worst possible seat.

WestJet and air Canada regularly have round trip tickets for 1 hour 5 minute nonstop round trip $203 flight with luggage.

$50 is a door crasher flash sale that only comes up once every so often.

2

u/mrcoolio 9h ago

Go to via rail right now and look up the cost to go from Ottawa to Toronto in 2-3 weeks.

That’s what I did before I commented.

2

u/Lambs2Lions_ 9h ago

I did. I picked Thursday the 24th. It’s $81 for the base fare, plus luggage. You can get slightly cheaper for even worse seats. Plus taxes it all comes out to $180-200 round trip once you include luggage. That’s round trip airfare price for 1/5th the time.

1

u/mrcoolio 9h ago

Not sure what to tell you. I checked the prices to confirm before saying anything. Would be a weird thing to lie about indeed.

1

u/Unusual_Cap3030 7h ago

Imo this is one of the only genuinely nice things about Southern Ontario, you can quite reasonably, quickly and affordably travel between most cities by rail, by-passing almost all urban traffic. Not to the standards of Japan, but it's there. I haven't actually lived there in 30 years, but it's something I take advantage of when I visit. And I'm always dumbfounded when I meet so many people there who don't use it.

→ More replies (4)

102

u/islandpancakes 16h ago

Small steps. But they add up!

18

u/Agoraphobicy 15h ago

It's almost like we had a mutually beneficial relationship with USA that got blown up and USA did not, in fact, have all the leverage.

The official White House of America statement said they did though.

46

u/summer_nights16 15h ago edited 15h ago

This is great news! Can you please work on expanding the railway now and add more destinations? The train won’t even go to Gaspésie.

29

u/Hennahane 15h ago

In the press conference Carney said service expansion is a focus of the government. Gaspé track repair is already in progres

12

u/Neptyo 14h ago

We badly need the train back on the Sea to sky in BC aswell 😅

10

u/BaronVonBearenstein 12h ago

I dream of the day where I can get on the train, sleep, and wake up in whistler instead of being stuck in traffic. I don't care if it's slower, I can spend the time reading and drinking my coffee

9

u/nottodayoilyjosh 14h ago

Omg I would love a train through the Laurentians stopping at Tadoussac/les Escoumins and going all the way to Gaspé!

4

u/summer_nights16 11h ago

Ditto! It’s a shame Canada is so huge but not easy to roam.

5

u/nottodayoilyjosh 14h ago

Omg I would love a train through the Laurentians stopping at Tadoussac/les Escoumins and going all the way to Gaspé!

3

u/R3M1N4T0R 11h ago

That would be so amazing! Scenic wagons so we can watch the beautiful nature all the way.

u/VinlandRocks 1h ago

NL humbly request one train route across the island from the ferry to st.john's. We still have the railbed from the tracks that were torn up when the government got rid of of our narrow gauge trains. Shipping here with trucks is expensive af.

76

u/Silicon_Knight 16h ago

Economic change doesn’t happen overnight like crashes. It takes years. We (Canada) is a wealthy country we can afford things like this that bring jobs and provide economic benefit here.

→ More replies (13)

23

u/Lantec 15h ago

Fuck yeah I love trains

31

u/hotDamQc 15h ago

Now cancel that F35 deal and tax American big tech. Then do like France and get Microsoft out of the government.

3

u/Corn_viper 14h ago

I don't think those CF-18s can fly another decade

6

u/hotDamQc 11h ago

We need to get a non American fighter but mainly drones. Ukraine war proved drones are a modern day battlefield requirement.

25

u/SquishyJeans 16h ago

Honestly unreal 

49

u/Sharp_Barnacle_9123 15h ago

Canada which is a well educated, sitting on massive resources and wealthy country did fine before free trade.

Canada does not need the USA.

→ More replies (5)

11

u/one-happy-chappie 13h ago

I'm really happy seeing these announcements hosted on the government website and not on X. I'm not sure if this is new, or if we're now just sharing the website more. But it's appreciated

4

u/cdnirene 12h ago

No, it’s not new. I’ve been checking this page every day since Carney was elected: https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news

I usually check in the evening when Carney’s public agenda will be posted for the next day. If a public announcement will be made, I check back after the time listed for announcement, to see the details.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Vin-diesels-left-nut 15h ago

Does CN and CP still have track priority ? If so kinda kills the via idea.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/SquareSouth5473 8h ago

The world hates Trump

11

u/n_mcrae_1982 15h ago

Let’s get some more service for western Canada. As a Winnipeg resident, I’d love to take a train ride to Edmonton or Toronto, but there’s only one cross country train a week and it passes through around 10 PM on a Tuesday.

5

u/boughbow 10h ago

Would love to see passenger rail service in Alberta, especially between Edmonton and Calgary. Seems like there's an opportunity for a nation-building project here. If Ontario/Quebec are getting high speed, why can't the rest of us?

2

u/No_Magician5266 10h ago

There’s 2 departures a week but I understand and agree with your overall point

16

u/Goat_Wizard_Doom_666 15h ago

That's cool, but can we get a passenger train that goes from Vancouver to Whistler/Pemberton?

→ More replies (3)

28

u/ebz37 15h ago

He just got the autism vote. 

4

u/No_Magician5266 10h ago

It’s funny because all these VIA Rail announcements are such a big political win for Carney but the procurement processes for both the locomotives and cars started in 2024. He just gets to reap the benefits of making the announcements 

16

u/macross1984 15h ago

A rare trend where government give thought to infrastructure.

5

u/LittleGreenSoldier 9h ago

God could you imagine how much money and emissions we'd save if they put a "business class" car on the high speed that politicians could take instead of flying from Toronto and Montreal to Ottawa?

15

u/Mr_Sagoo 12h ago

As a Brit I'm looking forward to spending money in Canada.

13

u/Hobolint8647 15h ago

No longer the Teflon Don, everything Trump touches now a days, blows up spectacularly in his face. He is his own shit volcano. Good on Canada - you stand in the sunshine, while the shit rains down on a vile man and the country that put him in office - twice.

2

u/jert3 13h ago

Not sure if matters much though. The regime has made it so elections barely even matter anymore. Trump will probably stay in power irregardless of any actual public support, as he is above the law and all three branches of government are now compromised.

6

u/Ok-Ordinary9374 14h ago

Let’s keep this momentum going, Canada!

3

u/Minyae 3h ago

I am soooo excited! I’ve been wanting to take the train in Canada forever but it’s been so out of date. 

Trains are so convenient in  Europe and I’ve always been so jealous of how you can get from one city to another city without  having to fly. Can’t wait. 

6

u/silicondali 15h ago

Truly momentous to see good news involving Thunder Bay make international headlines.

I'm very intrigued to see what the knock on effects are--especially if this means expansion of the Port of Thunder Bay for materials and ancillary supplies.

6

u/Exciting_Turn_9559 13h ago

I sincerely hope PM Carney lives a long and healthy life because without him we'd be in serious trouble.

4

u/Withoutsocks 14h ago

Can't we start with independent tracks for Via and CN so there is no more 8 hour delays in Belleville?

5

u/Sad-Advisor4004 13h ago

Really great. Let’s build Canada. We need a high speed rail in this country.

2

u/ghost_n_the_shell 12h ago

This is amazing.

Let’s keep this sort of thing up.
Build things we need and the world wants.

2

u/gastrodonfan2k07 11h ago

Bring back service to Calgary

2

u/cyclingkingsley 9h ago

Can we please speed up our high speed rail??

2

u/Equivalent_Dimension 8h ago

Great. Now can we also build them some tracks to run on so the a train trip from Toronto to Vancouver that should take 48 hours doesn't take four days?

u/Accomplished-Car120 46m ago

Canada get high speed rail before United States.

2

u/Nvrknew1 14h ago

Canada has the ability and resources to be self sufficient. 

3

u/blasphememes 12h ago

Going to need it for the wars

3

u/NaughtyGaymer 15h ago

FINALLY. I've been saying for so long how shameful our rail infrastructure is in Ontario especially. 50% of our entire population lives in Ontario corridor and we have dogshit rail supporting it.

2

u/Bromeromyme 13h ago

Goood for Canada. 🇨🇦 we deserve everything bad that’s gonna happen to the 🇺🇸 because of MAGA

2

u/coulls 13h ago

Good news. People probably don’t realise how far into the future this investment reaches. It’s not unreasonable to assume two generations will ride these.

2

u/Kyrie_Blue 11h ago

Okay Mark, now make rail travel in Canada affordable

3

u/CaskJeeves 10h ago

...I think that starts with building more trains

2

u/bentmonkey 14h ago

Good a strong rail infrastructure can be an economic backbone, and it lets passengers cross the country with ease.

2

u/Due-Wind-3324 10h ago

We’re building rail cars. What do you mean rail infrastructure? I obviously missed something here

1

u/bentmonkey 9h ago

oh yeah huh, well hopefully a robust rail car manufacturing industry will lead to more railroad investment in general.

2

u/cecepoint 2h ago

And hopefully this will entice more local travel throughout the country

2

u/Immediate-Grand8403 16h ago

Good job y’all. Congrats from us (unfortunate) meth lab residents. Elbows up.

1

u/monsterbandage 13h ago

Hope that means we also get expansions to our subway systems

1

u/busdriverbobbob 10h ago

About time. Glad to see it. Best time is yesterday, but 2nd best is today

1

u/tisler72 9h ago

LETS FUCKING GOOO!!! I'VE WAITED FOR THIS FOR YEARS!!!

1

u/SooBoy 9h ago

I would love access to high speed rail, but it’s a luxury when a lot of people don’t have necessities.

1

u/Billkamehameha 7h ago

Can it be high speed

wait has anyone put up a Simpsons monorail meme yet !

1

u/testthrowawayzz 7h ago

They shouldn't have allowd the sale of Bombardier Transportation to Alstom in the first place.

1

u/wtfastro 6h ago

But will they be faster?

2

u/Rashaen 5h ago

So I'm about to hear a bunch of US steel workers whining about how Biden, Obama, and immigrants ruined our manufacturing.... thanks a lot, Canada. How dare you make decisions in your own interest after our bronze baboon pissed all over a long standing friendship.

2

u/Ok_Material9377 5h ago

I wonder if one cent is earmarked for Western Canada

I love taking trains when I visit the Quebec Windsor corridor, but anywhere else in Canada (beyond Quebec and Ontario) has been a pain in my experience

1

u/happyscrappy 3h ago

This is just replenishment, right? That's what it seems to say. People are getting excited about "development" here, but this just looks like new rolling stock and some system upgrades on existing routes.

This is a good thing, it's keeping what works going. But it's not new development.

Can anyone suggest what would be good future routes would be for VIA rail? I feel like the biggest service markets are already served by Go Rail and the next biggest ones by VIA in Quebec and eastern Ontario.

Its's really hard to see anything west of, I dunno, London doing a lot of business with intercity rail. I guess maybe you can include Windsor/Detroit. VIA does already go there, but I don't know how big that business is.

I'm probably missing something though. What is the "next big thing" in terms of service areas for VIA?

1

u/JimmythePitbull 2h ago

We could save 3 billion dollars if we gave the workers for those 700 jobs $2 million each and told them to go away.

1

u/WhitewaterEchidna 1h ago

Love that he said, "Our rail cars on our long distance and remote routes are more than 70 years old. They were built when the NHL had six teams. Goalies wouldn't wear masks. The Leafs would win the cup. That's a long time ago."

-1

u/mightocondreas 15h ago

Under Mark Carney's leadership, Canada is becoming the wealthiest country on earth.

7

u/toonguy84 15h ago

Lol, let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

3

u/ukn_ 15h ago

That has to be a joke