r/worldnews Jun 24 '26

Russia/Ukraine The U.S. State Department believes that Ukraine is winning the war at this point

https://unn.ua/en/news/the-us-state-department-believes-that-ukraine-is-winning-the-war-at-this-point
27.5k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

6.7k

u/xMoZzzx Jun 24 '26

I mean the front is a stalemate and Russia's AA has no answer to the amount of drones Ukraine throws at them. So, yeah.

2.8k

u/313378008135 Jun 24 '26

its not just drones its missiles dropped from balloons coming in way above any air defence ceiling. the AA cant even hit them till they have free fallen for kilometers and are already directly above target.

1.1k

u/Thebritishlion Jun 24 '26

Wait, what?

2.4k

u/313378008135 Jun 24 '26

https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/ukraine-balloon-drone-carriers/

this is how they are doing it. use AI to predict high altitude wind and when conditions are right, send em up.

Edit: more credible source if you prefer: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/technology/general/ukraine-unveils-balloon-launched-missile-designed-to-evade-electronic-warfare/ar-AA25PV4j

821

u/greengreengreenleaf Jun 24 '26

Crazy. And I thought the whole launching drones hidden in a semi truck deep inside Russia was innovative.

942

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

Ukraine has been extremely innovative throughout this war which is why they're still in the fight. Drones have mitigated most of Russia's numerical advantages and turned this into a war of who can out innovate the other.

Other countries should take note of this as well. Ukraine hasn't survived because "Russia is weak and stupid" but because Ukraine is strong and constantly adapting. It shouldn't be assumed that other countries can do what Ukraine has done and Ukraine's allies should also adapt Ukrainian methods of warfare. I still can't believe the US didn't have any interceptor drones when they launched a war with Iran and then frantically had to buy them from Ukraine after the war started when Iran started launching Shaheds.

406

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

304

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

A lot of Russians are also just blatently racist. I remember hearing jokes about the uselessness of a physics textbook written in Ukrainian (the joke is that Ukrainians are so stupid it would be completely unnecessary). There's a common slur in Russia that starts with a K for Ukrainians with a stereotype of them basically being backwards rubes.

Obviously this stereotypes aren't remotely based on anything other than Russian racism and views of their own superiority but they are pervasive. If you think your enemy is inferior and incapable of innovation then it can be hard to imagine any scenario where they genuinely do things better than you.

257

u/Sudden-Wash4457 Jun 25 '26

Heavily ironic given that Ukraine was considered the thinktank of the USSR

21

u/Key-Demand-2569 Jun 25 '26

Yeah it’s strange, I’m a millennial and was with a woman for years who was Ukrainian, Soviet birth certificate and all.

Wound up knowing a lot of Ukrainians who had immigrated to the US.

I know it’s **completely** anecdotal but almost all of them, related to my girlfriend or not, were incredibly smart hard working people.

Culturally in terms of mannerisms and demeanor there was definitely a bit of clash with my purely American upbringing, but my impression of Ukrainians was pretty much always impressed.

Maybe not the best in a sales role in the US… but that’s not too important in war, lol.

142

u/Piccolo-Complete Jun 25 '26

Wasn't Ukraine like the center of Soviet industry and technology?

115

u/swiftwin Jun 25 '26

I remember reading that like 40% of the USSR's military research and production was in Ukraine. For example, the Moskva flagship that the Ukrainians sank was built in Ukraine. Same with many of the Cold War tanks the Russians have been pulling out of storage.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/hatsune_aru Jun 25 '26

Can you imagine where we'd be if we lifted Ukraine out of poverty and stagnation decades ago? We'd be sailing the stars today

→ More replies (4)

160

u/El_Peregrine Jun 25 '26

These Russians sound an awful lot like… the Nazis 

113

u/socialistrob Jun 25 '26

It's a lot easier to wage wars of conquest when you have a population that believes in their own innate superiority and dehumanizes other people. Of course believing your own lies about your own superiority can also get you into a ton of trouble.

→ More replies (0)

18

u/TheOtherHobbes Jun 25 '26

The Nazis had idiot drug-addicts for leaders, but their engineering was world class.

Russia also has the idiot drug-addict leaders, and they're shutting down the Internet and sending their top engineers and students to die.

All they have left is a fine culture of criminal hackers and bot farms - interesting, but not enough to win a war.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (3)

49

u/infinus5 Jun 25 '26

its really funny that russians think of themselves are the brilliant leaders of the USSR but it was the Poles, Ukrainians and other SSRs that were bringing in the smarts. Russia just took all the credit!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

19

u/sg19point3 Jun 25 '26

Ukraine was a major manufacturing hub in the Soviet union. Rockets, planes etc, russia on the other hand was a gas station and remains to this day

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

141

u/70ms Jun 24 '26

I’m convinced that Ukraine was the brain of the USSR.

173

u/No_Accountant3232 Jun 24 '26

Ukraine is where they pulled most of their talent over the decades that the USSR existed. They'd have long since been a part of the EU and been a major innovator if they hadn't had a large pro-Russian population that kept voting in corrupt pro-Russian politicians.

Now because of Russian aggression practically nobody is pro-Russian anymore. A lot of the corruption has been weeded out. Ukraine has a lot to offer on the world stage now once the war is over. If proper democratic elections restart after the war they're going to come out of this more trustworthy than the USA.

63

u/Violent_Milk Jun 25 '26

if they hadn't had a large pro-Russian population that kept voting in corrupt pro-Russian politicians.

And the reason for that is Stalin moved in a bunch of Russians after Holodomor.

29

u/vonGlick Jun 25 '26

That was Russia's standard playbook. Send Russian colonist, destroy local bonds and culture etc. I remember from my visit in Arctic Museum in Rovaniemi an exhibition about Winter War. Apparently Stalin already prepared orders to forcefully move Finnish population east or Urals and replace them with Russian colonists. Finland as we know it today would simply not exist. It would be one of many backwater dumps blessed with russian mir disease.

→ More replies (0)

77

u/twoisnumberone Jun 25 '26

they're going to come out of this more trustworthy than the USA

Sadly not a high bar at this point.

→ More replies (9)

62

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

They were the brain and a major part of the brawn. A lot of the weapons industry of the USSR was located in Ukraine especially for ship building and missiles. In WWII several million Ukrainians fought in the Red Army and 1.6 million of them died.

Ukraine was an innovative player when they were part of the USSR and they were a military powerhouse as part of the USSR too. If Putin ever wants Russia to be a world power he NEEDS Ukraine. With Ukraine Russia is a great power and without them they're just another country.

NATO countries need to realize that Putin will go to great lengths to take Ukraine and they also need to realize that Ukraine makes NATO stronger and safer.

19

u/brucee10 Jun 25 '26

Ukraine could make NATO a drone fortress. They'll need a huge rebuild when this is over and I'm sure their new friends would love some new toys and training.

12

u/Donnicton Jun 25 '26

That's already the plan. SK, Taiwan and Japan are also all courting Ukraine for their drone knowledge to build a deterrent against China.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/ants_are_everywhere Jun 24 '26

That explains why the Soviets tried to starve them

→ More replies (24)
→ More replies (6)

789

u/saintvicent Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

Ingenious solution. Reminds me of the Japanese balloon strikes to start fires in forests in the US

429

u/313378008135 Jun 24 '26

it is indeed - it gives a huge part of the intercontinental missile threat, without the cost of space launch. you just have to be able to predict high altitude wind and model it to a high degree - then that tells you where to send the balloon up and when, to place it over its target at a future time.

requires a lot of processing and modelling though. must be a lot of GPUS somewhere working on that.

178

u/space_fountain Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

At the moment there are open models that predict and publish winds on a corse grids across the globe. It might be good enough for this? 

68

u/313378008135 Jun 24 '26

interesting proposition. if it could get "over an area" with a coarse location and then use its own internal guidance to be more precise that would make what you propose possible. the challenge is precise guidance once over a target. you cant rely on gps (though ironically, probably could rely on glonass)

22

u/space_fountain Jun 24 '26

From the article it sounds like it uses gps while at high altitude and turns it off as it accelerates towards the ground? But not sure how wide spread the jamming is. Also not sure how accurate you could get based on publicly available models. I’m guessing wind direction and speed doesn’t change very sharply at high elevations so maybe pretty accurate actually?

3

u/TheTastiestTaint Jun 25 '26

it wouldn't be impossible to run fibre optic from the carrier balloon and have the balloon transmit video/control line of sight to a pilot with high gain antenna 50km back.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (2)

17

u/willstr1 Jun 24 '26

Depending on what you are targeting you could possibly use a computer vision system as long as the target is distinct enough (like an airbase runway or oil refinery or giant tanks of a fuel depot)

15

u/No_Accountant3232 Jun 24 '26

Raspberry Pi with a good camera could probably accomplish it cheaply. There's plenty of code online that can be adapted as long as you've got a good pic of the area to choose your targets you can have it preprogrammed to hit anything

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Hidesuru Jun 25 '26

You don't need to be able to see the target the entire time if you have imagery at multiple levels. Start with "aim for that city block" then "that building there" then finally "northeast corner of the rooftop" or whatever.

7

u/Suspicious_Bicycle Jun 25 '26

Recent videos on the strikes I've seen indicate the drones have redundant systems, GPS (US and Soviet based), inertial navigation and visual acquisition.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (2)

19

u/zvii Jun 24 '26

I mean, it's effectively the same or similar to how hot air balloons navigate. They're just using data compiled from weather balloons that get released around the globe every morning and afternoon.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/Earlier-Today Jun 24 '26

The jet streams tend to be pretty consistent in their patterns, and the ones over Ukraine mainly blow east.

15

u/Real-Mobile-2784 Jun 24 '26

First time hearing about this. That’s freaking awesome.

15

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

82

u/Slappyfist Jun 24 '26

Not only ingenious but the air flow really only goes East to West, so Russia can't even steal the idea and use it back at Ukraine.

107

u/Extension_Common_518 Jun 24 '26

West to east maybe?

48

u/Slappyfist Jun 24 '26

Ah right, yeah that's what I mean.

It's way too hot where I am currently so I half assed my comment

11

u/Extension_Common_518 Jun 24 '26

Easily done, I knew what you meant. Good luck with the heat…typhoons approaching here in Japan. In for a wet and breezy couple of days.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/colintbowers Jun 24 '26

Interesting, interesting… *The French quickly scribbling notes and glancing covertly at the Germans*

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

36

u/SqouzeTheSqueeze Jun 24 '26

Yep. I remember reading about these, very interesting.

→ More replies (11)

41

u/NativeMasshole Jun 24 '26

Goddamn. Aerial bombardment technology has come full circle.

111

u/AppleSlacks Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

Makes me wonder about that balloon China flew over the US a bit ago.

Edit: we were aware of the balloon earlier than I recalled, see replies below.

112

u/RUcringe Jun 24 '26

It didnt sneak in at all though. The U.S. tracked that balloon during its whole journey

28

u/AppleSlacks Jun 24 '26

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Chinese_balloon_incident?wprov=sfti1#

I did not recall the sequence of events correctly, but you are right that the US government did state they were aware of it from its launch location.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (22)
→ More replies (11)

14

u/czhunc Jun 24 '26

Why are we going steampunk again?

18

u/willstr1 Jun 24 '26

History much like poetry doesn't always repeat itself but quite often rhymes

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Purple_Break1559 Jun 24 '26

Jesus well done Ukraine

→ More replies (33)

78

u/Intendant Jun 24 '26

Ballons are cheap and can drop missiles and glide bombs from way above what AA can reach. They can cruise along at 60k+ ft after launching off the balloon then dive on a target.

78

u/MilmoWK Jun 24 '26

Russian AA took out Gary powers in his U2 at ~70k feet, mig 29 operational ceiling is ~60k feet too . They could take these balloons but it would be terribly expensive. Very funny if Ukraine started launching dozens of $100 balloons a day, most with no payloads just to use up those Russian missiles and jet fuel.

21

u/willstr1 Jun 24 '26

Russian AA might not work against a balloon if the AA missiles are heat seeking, not much engine heat on a balloon

29

u/ShadowPsi Jun 24 '26

A false heat source can be rigged up really cheaply. A battery and a resistor are all you need. Use metallic foil for the balloon and you give it a massive radar profile too.

19

u/willstr1 Jun 24 '26

Good point, you send a few decoys to keep the AA busy while the other balloons sneak past

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

14

u/notFREEfood Jun 25 '26

Big AA missiles that can go that high are radar guided

But you send up a bunch of balloons all at once, and interception becomes cost prohibitive.

5

u/Spookyrabbit Jun 25 '26

Something tells me China is already adapting drone tech and strategy for use against a carrier group. No way the group can carry enough interceptors to fend off a sustained attack by drones.
Between drones and their hypersonic missiles, our carrier groups are starting to look awful vulnerable.

It's a good thing we have all those senior officers with actual battlefield experience over in the Pentagon, hard at work developing new plans and strategies for dealing with these new threats....

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

49

u/haloweenek Jun 24 '26

Wind blows east, from Ukraine to Russia. No option to change that. Drones are ferried xxx+ km on a balloon and start mission with 98% battery’s.

Guess what’s next.

→ More replies (2)

36

u/Key_Delivery_4257 Jun 24 '26

H I Sutton latest video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iD6XaaO9bEo

Doesn't post that often but he is a professional analyst who treats youtube as a bit of fun. Most times when you see someone post something with a nautical graphic his name is connected

→ More replies (2)

113

u/NotSoFastLady Jun 24 '26

Ukraine has developed effective counter measures that have been able to thwart Russia's most effective and cost affordable air weapons. Their glide bombs. Routinely Russia has been able to find and implement adjustments that counter Ukrainian electronic warfare systems but that is currently not happening.

Additionally Ukraine continues to out innovate Russia's drone warfare.

26

u/myownzen Jun 24 '26

I was reading on ISW today and to me they make it sound like yes Ukraine has the edge there but it's not likely to last for too long and Russia will have an effective enough counter sooner than later. It sounded like Ukraine should press the advantage for all it's worth while they have it.

28

u/Krivvan Jun 25 '26

The war has been like that in general with one side or the other quickly adapting. One innovation where Russia actually started it and has an edge in is fiber optic drones, but that ended up forcing Ukraine into innovating past them while Russia is sorta stuck with them. Russia consequently does not have much in the way of AI-assisted drones unlike Ukraine.

Generally, Ukraine seems to be better at quickly innovating whereas Russia is better able to scale certain innovations.

→ More replies (29)

262

u/Kakkoister Jun 24 '26

It's only a stalemate in terms of land. But that's only one aspect of war. Ukraine is winning the war of attrition. Russia cannot keep this up for long with even less oil exports, and if Ukraine takes more major refineries offline, Russia will be on the ropes and either Putin will have to give up, or get off'd, or do the crazier egotistical option of escalating to nuclear.

166

u/WarningAppropriate27 Jun 24 '26

He can't. Two main reasons.

Russia would be an international pariah more than it already is. How long would they last if China stopped selling them things and every bit of trade from the trading partners also stopped under basically the world pressuring any country that was still willing. 

Putin would have to go all out with nuclear weapons and not just one and done because the cost of using one would be as high as using ten or twenty. Then he'd have to hope there's no retribution and hope Russia can just wait things out until everyone is less pissed.

Secondly, using nuclear weapons signals weakness that the supposedly second most powerful army in the world can't win a fight against a smaller neighbor without hitting the panic button.

Both terrible consequences for Russia and Putin. He'd have a drink of tea while leaning heavily out a window before the nukes would fly.

97

u/Enjoyer_of_Cake Jun 24 '26

Any Russian who signs off on a nuke knows they sign their own death warrant as well.

70

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

Absolutely. If you're a Russian oligarch life is still pretty good. You have your mansion and your yacht and it's not you or your family being sent to Ukraine. Supporting Putin means living in luxury for the oligarch class right now.

If Putin starts actually using nukes then suddenly that could change and open you up to real danger. If Putin staying in charge changes from "living in luxury" to "potentially dying in a nuclear firestorm" for oligarchs then they're not going to stay loyal to him.

17

u/grchelp2018 Jun 25 '26

hey're not going to stay loyal to him.

They are not staying loyal out of the goodness of their hearts. They hold no power.

7

u/SadhuSalvaje Jun 25 '26

I have difficulty picturing in my head exactly where power lies in Russia. Does Putin exercise his power through his control of the Security/Intelligence services? Or is it some other mechanism that keeps him in office.

9

u/jpw0w Jun 25 '26

26 years of murdering/imprisoning your opposition helps I assume

→ More replies (1)

12

u/RainbowwDash Jun 24 '26

Any human being, nowadays

No matter which country fired first

→ More replies (3)

49

u/Raised_bi_Wolves Jun 24 '26

And to add to all of that, Nuke's are horrible, and destructive, yes. But It wouldn't end Ukraines resolve, I don't think, at this point. Smaller tactical nukes are essentially ineffective as armies no longer gather/assault in large formations anymore. So you'd need to use larger ones and destroy urban areas. Now what, you've destroyed downtown Kyiv, you haven't meaningfully reduced Ukraines ability to defend itself. Rather now, you have - massive rally-round-the-flag effect against you, Nato joins in the "kinetic sanctions" because of the use of a nuke, and China sees a great opportunity to carve big chunks off of Russia in the ensuing chaos.

53

u/Buckets-O-Yarr Jun 24 '26

And to add to all of *that*, the nuclear fallout literally blows back on Russia.

16

u/BradBradley1 Jun 24 '26

That’s a sacrifice Pootin is willing to make. 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

13

u/ArislanShiva Jun 24 '26

The biggest reason why he won't is because he personally has more to lose than just about anybody. He has stolen hundreds of billions over the years and a lot of it sits in banks overseas. If the world order collapses a lot of that accumulated wealth gets zeroed.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (8)

257

u/SSV_Hack Jun 24 '26

I mean... it's not quite a stalemate - it does seem like we are losing Konstantynivka - which is a major defence spot and strategically very important. That being said it is also becoming obvious that the price Russia has to pay for every gain is becoming beyond absurd and is unsustainable

21

u/zoobrix Jun 25 '26

it does seem like we are losing Konstantynivka - which is a major defence spot and strategically very important.

It's an important point of resistance for Ukraine becuase it keeps Russia farther from the larger cities of sloviansk and Kramatorsk, but even if Russia took it tomorrow it doesn't really get Russia closer to winning the war or accomplishing any of their strategic goals. The entire war Russia has constantly restated its goals are the complete submission of the Ukrainian state, limits on the size of its army and Russia would get veto power over any potential alliance Ukraine wanted to make. That's just surrender by another name, Russia wants full control of Ukraine, not just the rest of the Donbass.

Part of why losing Konstantinovka seems like a big deal is because Russia has been attacking it for almost a year, and Ukraine has of course sacrificed many lives in its defense. It feels important, but it was a medium size city of 60,000 before the war, its loss doesn't open up some big door for Russia to push through. The Ukrainian army is not going to collapse when Konstantinovka falls of course. So while it feels like some kind of victory for Russia, like you said the price is "beyond absurd and is unsustainable."

Of course losing the city is a tragedy for the people that lived there, it's horrible anyone suffers through wars.

But I think it's important to put Konstantinovka in the larger picture of the war, and that is that Russia still controls far less territory than they did in the summer of 2022. Grinding out a few more cities in the east isn't going to get them functionally any closer to winning the war.

115

u/Old_Ladies Jun 24 '26

Putin is willing to sacrifice every 18+ male Russian other than himself. Putin thinks it's worth it.

51

u/WayneKrane Jun 24 '26

Good luck! Their population was already in decline, it must be in a free fall now.

76

u/Old_Ladies Jun 24 '26

Putin won't live long enough to see those consequences.

53

u/Chumlee1917 Jun 24 '26

The next Ruler of Russia gets to look on as China turns it into a new colony

31

u/Formal-Throughput Jun 24 '26

As Sarah Paine points out - China needs fresh water and Russia has a lot of it. 

23

u/MostlyWong Jun 24 '26

Lake Baikal is just north of the Mongolian border, and it's got around 20% of all the unfrozen fresh water on Earth, even more than the Great Lakes. Seems like a prime target for uh, "negotiations".

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

24

u/bloop7676 Jun 24 '26

Their rate of advance has been consistently slowing down enough compared to past years though that I really don't think they'll reach much farther. Considering how long it took to take Pokrovsk and that they're moving slower now, even if they do get through Konstantynivka I don't think they're likely to be able to complete taking Donbass as they intended.

→ More replies (2)

24

u/NotSoFastLady Jun 24 '26

Not to mention the significance of the recent drone strikes in Moscow. I'm sure they can spin their own forces mistakenly blowing up that tank into evil Ukrainian aggression with some. But not so much with the people Putin needs to keep happy.

I haven't heard anything in a while but it was rumored he was very nervous ahead of the May day celebrations. I have to wonder how he feels with all of these very successful deep strikes inside key Russian territories.

→ More replies (4)

84

u/NotSoFastLady Jun 24 '26

It's not a stalemate. On some fronts yes and others now. Compared to 2024 and 2025, Ukraine has essentially ground Russia to a hault and has recaptured territory. All with minimal support from the US since Trump came back to power. I would say that's significant.

43

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

The Russian economy is also significantly worse off now than in 2024 and Russian casualties are higher than their recruitment rate meanwhile Ukraine makes 20,000 drones a day and still gets funding and weapons from Europe.

The current course is unsustainable for Russia. The next big question is "what will Russia change to try to start winning the war and how effective will it be."

7

u/AdCreepy5165 Jun 24 '26

Front isn't really a stalemate anymore. Situation is reversed. Russia was slowly gaining meters of land thru volume of troops last year. Ukraine is now using deep strikes to cut off vulnerable areas and slowly grind back meters of land.

27

u/destuctir Jun 24 '26

The difference between a country trying to pretend a war isn’t happening and a country fighting for its continued existence

→ More replies (32)

3.7k

u/ArgentineBeauty Jun 24 '26

Four years ago people said Ukraine wouldn't survive.

Now we're having conversations about whether Ukraine is winning.

That's an incredible achievement in itself.

Keep it up 🇺🇦

832

u/A_Tigerstorm Jun 24 '26

Agreed. Ukraine deserves the praise, and Russia can go fuck itself

224

u/HumanBeing7396 Jun 24 '26

… and Russia does in fact appear to be doing that.

82

u/BelacRLJ Jun 25 '26

What are you talking about?  Their birth rate is in free fall.  Nobody’s fucking anyone in Russia.

58

u/Refun712 Jun 25 '26

In mother Russia, we fuck ourselves!

→ More replies (1)

8

u/xtrapas Jun 25 '26

there would be more fucking if that "gay thing" (dont be gay or else) wouldnt exist. there is some fucking though ^

8

u/axelkoffel Jun 25 '26

Oh it does exist, especially in russian military as a form of bullying. In many places of russian culture it's only gay the be the passive one of the gay sex act. While there's nothing gay about being the one who fucks the other guy, because it's just a power move.
I know it sounds dumb, but the entire structure of russian army is built on this system of brutally bullying those below you, with gay rape being one of the methods. And you take the bullying, hoping that one day you will be the one that bullies new recruits. There's even a term for it, дедовщина (dyedowshchyna).

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

71

u/Mrguy4771 Jun 24 '26

Whenever I see these videos of like advanced drone warfare, I think back to when the war first started. All of those people in their homes making molotov cocktails waiting for the ground invasion of Kyiv. What insane turnaround.

4

u/startingalawnmower2 Jun 25 '26

You bring up a good point - it's truly impressive how far they've come!

149

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '26

[deleted]

94

u/mittenknittin Jun 25 '26

If the folks at the state department can convince Trump that Ukraine is winning it would go a long way. Trump likes winners, hates losers. Imagine Trump flipping and deciding Putin is a loser and insulting him the way he did Zelenskyy in the Oval Office

53

u/frequenZphaZe Jun 25 '26

If the folks at the state department can convince Trump that Ukraine is winning

they have. and then he talks to putin and is convinced russia is winning. then he talks to EU leaders and is convinced ukraine is winning. he believed whatever the last person told him to believe

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

219

u/Smok3dSalmon Jun 24 '26

I wish someone would release that list of influencers who were paid to push Russian propaganda 

231

u/khakiwallprint Jun 24 '26

Basically the guest list at the white House ufc fight would be pretty close

39

u/Smok3dSalmon Jun 24 '26

We’ll have to cross reference that against the list of those pardoned by Trump in the future

→ More replies (2)

81

u/needlestack Jun 24 '26

Basically anyone that supports Trump can be thrown in that rotten pile of deplorables. They all stood on the side of evil.

38

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

It wasn't just astro turfers and bots. In Russia the conventional wisdom was that Ukraine would fall in a few days and in the US it was that Ukraine would fall in a few weeks. If you want to read an article that REALLY aged poorly check out Michael Koffman's "Russia's Shock and Awe" in Foreign Affairs where he concluded that there was nothing Ukraine could do to stop a Russian take over and even insurgency was pointless because of how powerful Russia is.

There were a few voices (mainly people who had worked with the Ukrainian military) who seemed to think Ukraine wasn't totally screwed but they were the minority. It's pretty amazing just how wrong the analyst community was in the west. In online spaces like reddit very few people questioned the overall narrative either.

25

u/BattleHall Jun 25 '26

To be fair, it was pretty touch and go initially. If the Russians had been able to successfully assassinate the Ukrainian leadership (which they attempted), or even just got them to flee, and/or if they had been able to successfully establish and defend an air bridge at Hostomel, that might have been enough to throw the UKR defense into disarray and get people thinking it was fait accompli. But they didn't, in large part because they half assed it and because the Ukrainian intelligence services did a great job of feeding the Russians bullshit in the years prior.

19

u/mothtoalamp Jun 25 '26

There are a few things missing from this (but a LOT happened so that's understandable) so here's a few more:

Russia failed to take out Ukraine's air defenses in the opening strikes. US intelligence got the timing right and got the Ukrainians to move their defenses in time. The Russians missed their targets and prevented the Russians from gaining air superiority. As a result the Russians were forced to fly low and be vulnerable to MANPADs.

The pervasive culture of lying and stealing meant Russian assets were in atrocious shape and many were not in good condition to attack. Vehicles were missing fuel and wiring, were not maintained appropriately, their operators untrained and lax, among a host of other readiness issues.

The Russians really underestimated the Ukrainian will to resist. Russian intelligence genuinely expected the Ukrainians would welcome them as liberators. Russian AND Western intelligence thought Zelenskyy would flee the country and attempt a government in exile, which the West was prepared to endorse. Instead, Zelenskyy stayed in the capital and gave us his historic "I need ammunition, not a ride." And Ukrainian civilians mobilized in force. Clips of the babushka saying to Russian troops to carry sunflower seeds. Civilians making molotov cocktails. etc.

It really was a perfect storm of Russian inadequacy, Western intelligence, and Ukrainian will that made their defense hold.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/THE_CHOPPA Jun 25 '26

What I see not being brought up enough is the years of training the US provided from 2015 to 2022 to over 20,000 Ukrainian soldiers. People vastly underestimated how much that allowed Ukraine to perform so effectively against the invasion.

5

u/lhmodeller Jun 25 '26

The UK trained 22,000 Ukrainians in Ukraine from 2015 to 2022 under Operation Orbital, and a further 30,000 in the UK by November 2023 under Operation Interflex. The UK is now focusing on advanced and specialist training, since the 11,000 Ukrainian instructors trained under Interflex are providing basic training in Ukraine.

→ More replies (2)

26

u/BAHatesToFly Jun 24 '26

Tim Pool aka the guy who refuses to take off his beanie because he's bald is one of them.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/metengrinwi Jun 24 '26

I guess it wasn’t a complete list—only 6 of em.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Tenet_Media_investigation

→ More replies (8)

9

u/EvilLibrarians Jun 25 '26

My coworker four years ago said he gave it a month before Russia won.

I’ve worked three other jobs since then and moved twice. Crazy

→ More replies (4)

21

u/edfitz83 Jun 25 '26

And Trump showed his incompetence by not supporting Ukraine. They now have the world’s best knowledge of drone tactics and how future wars will be fought. Biden supported Ukraine, Trump is in awe of Putin for being an Ironman dictator. He’s also been groomed as a Russian asset since the 80’s.

Why would Ukraine want to share their knowledge and cheap drone and missile blueprints?

Blueprints for $2000-10k drones that could be turned over to US defense contractors, to be produced for 10-30 times the cost, in the districts of influential members of congress?

34

u/eliceev_alexander Jun 24 '26

Right. If it had been Biden or Harris instead of Trump, the victory would have come even faster.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/isoAntti Jun 24 '26

Don't forget all the tanks they pulled.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)

2.5k

u/Elipwnsyou Jun 24 '26

And to think, a year ago these dipshits were trying to get them to surrender so Trump could get a photo opp and make a run at the peace prize to get back at Obama

862

u/drunkenbrawler Jun 24 '26

They still are.

118

u/National-Charity-435 Jun 24 '26

I'm down to bait the orange clown into thinking a square would be memorialized in his name

..then string him along through more air defense for civilians and and rebuilding investments

32

u/POB_42 Jun 24 '26

This is how the world thought they could manage Trump during his first term. Then COVID, Ukraine War, Israel Gaza war, etc.

Then we realised there was already no room for someone so stupid bribeable commanding the largest military in the Western world.

Then Maduro gets shanghai'd, and we all watched agape.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

46

u/dissociater Jun 25 '26

And if Ukraine does ultimately win you just know that Trump et al will take credit for it and claim they always believe Ukraine would win.

13

u/BarFamiliar5892 Jun 25 '26

Trump has zero leverage over Ukraine any more so I hope Zelenskyy tells him to get fucked

8

u/Sutar_Mekeg Jun 25 '26

Obama's not trying very hard to get a FIFA peace prize.

→ More replies (3)

61

u/Snuffleupagus03 Jun 25 '26

Russia should try offering them $300 billion

1.5k

u/Optimal_Brain_2908 Jun 24 '26

Where are all those assholes that said Zelenskyy and Ukraine needed to sacrifice their homeland for peace?

658

u/c4rdsfan3 Jun 24 '26

Have fun watching them take credit for Ukraines victory

186

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

I've already seen some comments saying that "Trump cutting off weapons is what enabled Ukraine to fight independently."

I'm convinced that if the US hadn't imposed strike limitations on Ukraine, hadn't delayed key weapons for years and had continued to pass major aid bills for Ukraine then the war would be over right now and Ukraine would have recovered all their territory.

→ More replies (25)

19

u/moosekin16 Jun 24 '26

They’ll ignore all the details and just stick with “America gave them our leftover Cold War weapons and Ukraine beat Russia!” and completely ignore all the bullshit Trump and co did in the meantime.

Gotta know your weird blind republican American patriotism.

→ More replies (3)

25

u/digitalpencil Jun 24 '26

In St Petersburg, drowning themselves in vodka, I expect.

→ More replies (3)

57

u/Piggywonkle Jun 24 '26

Celebrating their 'complicated' relationship with Iran

39

u/tap_the_glass Jun 24 '26

They’re running the US government

12

u/karer3is Jun 24 '26

At least some of them are trying to score some seats in parliament over here in Germany...

→ More replies (38)

517

u/willismthomp Jun 24 '26

They don’t have gasoline in Moscow. They are winning the war.

103

u/Lanster27 Jun 25 '26

This war is basically 101: how to fuck up your superpower country.

62

u/burf Jun 25 '26

Russia hasn't been a superpower for quite a while in most respects. If it weren't for the decades-old nukes and their highly effective psyops on western powers, they'd just be another random nation. Which is probably part of the reason guys like Putin feel the need to expand into neighbouring prosperous countries.

13

u/Sellazard Jun 25 '26

Would have been great if russia was just another random boring country with nothing particular happening

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

84

u/okiedokie1183 Jun 24 '26

The big change is that Ukraine is successfully hollowing out their rear logistics. Trucks are being destroyed en masse at the moment. This will lead to an eventual collapse at the front. All the recent successes in Crimea are the big breakthrough.

34

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

It's a real possibility. Yes the front is a massive kill zone and advancing is hard for all sides but at the same time maintaining that kill zone requires Russia to constantly send in more men, ammo, vehicles and drones. It's an enormous logistical effort and if they can't do that then it may be hard to hold the line.

→ More replies (2)

425

u/maersyl Jun 24 '26

Seems Ukraine has a whole fuckton of cards now then eh?

226

u/CrisisActor911 Jun 24 '26

Yes and no. Yes they are in the advantage position right now and are “bringing the war home” to Russia, but the frontline in Ukraine is basically a miles long drone kill zone that neither side can advance through (obviously to Ukraine’s benefit as the defending army), and we’ve yet to see if “bringing the war home” influences the people in Russia who need to be influenced.

The war is basically at a standstill, but a standstill is to Ukraine’s advantage.

61

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

If Ukraine can keep striking the logistic lines with mid range drones then it could become effectively impossible for Russia to bring the fuel, weapons and personnel needed to hold the Southern Front.

Maintaining a kill zone requires logistics and extensive resources so it's not a guarantee Russia will be able to maintain that indefinitely.

→ More replies (3)

51

u/ethanlan Jun 24 '26

Yup, Russia was already at a demographic crisis before this war they really can't afford to be sending wave after wave of men into a death trap.

Even still, the war has long progressed into being anything but a disaster for Russia. Even if they achieve total victory and annex what they want it wont be nearly enough to make up for their loss of military prestige and loss of life and material. Also the damage Ukraine has caused.

31

u/CrisisActor911 Jun 24 '26

Oh absolutely, the consequences of the war have been a massive loss for Russia’s economy and global prestige, and it’s going to cause generational damage to Russia’s economy and politics. But the war itself is at a stalemate - you could say Russia is winning because they occupy more Ukrainian territory than when they started, or you could say Ukraine is winning because they’ve forced a global power to a standstill and have started retaking a bit of lost territory. Either way, a stalemate is amazing for Ukraine, and convinces allies that their military and economic aid are going to good use.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

37

u/ParanoidFactoid Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

No. They may be winning the war, but according to Trump and Vance they still hold no cards. Perhaps they have drones and infantry kill bots. But still no cards. Except the ace of spades, to be handed out to Russian losers on the battlefield.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

227

u/ErasmosOrolo Jun 24 '26

Trump could have actually been on the winning side. If he wasn’t Putin’s dog.

146

u/BengBeng_93 Jun 24 '26

For a guy who likes winning, he sure chooses to lose an awful lot

10

u/Pantarus Jun 25 '26

He never wins. He literally has fucked up everything he’s ever touched. If he wasn’t born rich or his last name was Smith, he’d be the village idiot.

He just says he wins. Over and over. Louder and louder. For some u godly reason, people keep believing him. Other more clever people latch on to the “brand” and keep him floating.

He cares a lot less about ACTUALLY winning than the perception of him winning.

Fucking jerk that he is.

22

u/Kiwi_Fried_Chicken Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

It's the grifter's code and cultist's following.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/friss0nFry Jun 25 '26

The main reason we've had Trump is to aid Russia in it's invasion. He's the cumination of decades of destabilization efforts against Russia's biggest foe. The division was the secondary goal. Even if Ukraine wins, Russia still won the cold war by destroying the US.

→ More replies (3)

592

u/PansophicNostradamus Jun 24 '26

Common sense says they’d have won already if Trump wasn’t Trump and we actually stand for and behind our ally in Ukraine.

But, here we are…

307

u/machine4891 Jun 24 '26

It's partially benefitial for Ukraine because before, everything they got from US had that catch "it can't be used on russia territory - it's escalation". Now that Ukraine was cut from US support, they invested a lot into making their own weapons and now that it's theirs and theirs only, they can strike wherever they want. EU countries also lifted restriction on how to use their stuff.

47

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

Now that Ukraine was cut from US support, they invested a lot into making their own weapons

Those weapons were already in development when Biden was president. Designing and mass producing new weapons systems takes years and Ukraine would be fielding these weapons regardless of who had won the US presidential election.

→ More replies (3)

119

u/Toxic_Lithium Jun 24 '26

Bottom line, it’s incredible how Ukraine persevered. Hopefully they can continue.

76

u/Brodellsky Jun 24 '26

Zelensky staying was never in their plans, and it absolutely is the catalyst for what eventually led to them getting all their weapons production in full swing.

He needed ammo. Not a ride

32

u/Hairy_Mycologist_945 Jun 25 '26

Zelensky is one of the bravest and most effective wartime leaders I've ever heard of. It's sad and incredibly inspiring seeing what he's been through and accomplished.

4

u/Strong-Search-2301 Jun 25 '26

He is not perfect, but he is the leader that Ukraine and Europe needs

45

u/Toxic_Lithium Jun 24 '26

That line will be in the history books forever.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/zdavolvayutstsa Jun 24 '26

They were already making those investments. There wasn't an additional impetuous. The programs were multi-years efforts that took time to come to fruition. That US weapons couldn't be used in Russia was already reason enough.

→ More replies (5)

103

u/Danielbes Jun 24 '26

It's actually not as straightforward as that. When Biden was president, who was very pro Ukraine, they placed a lot of limitations on Ukraine's ability to strike within Russia itself if Ukraine wanted continued military supplies. Trump throwing that support out the window has allowed Ukraine to target all of this oil infrastructure which is having a major impact on the war.

27

u/socialistrob Jun 24 '26

Those limitations were based on US provided weapons. The strikes right now are being done with Ukrainian made weapons so if the US had maintained Biden's policies these strikes would still be happening. The reason we didn't see strikes like this earlier was because these weapons have taken years for Ukraine to develop so carrying out these strikes in 2023 or 2024 would have required other countries to provide them.

Trump has been an absolute disaster for Ukraine. It's true Biden could have done more but that doesn't make up for how many Ukrainians have needlessly died because of Trump's policies.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

72

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/Old_Ladies Jun 24 '26

All that money and lives spent on that stupid war that most likely isn't going to be over any time soon either. Imagine if Ukraine could have used all those interceptors to keep their civilians safe.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

14

u/Loreki Jun 24 '26

Now if only you had a government capable of being happy about that.

39

u/RVAblues Jun 24 '26

Bad year for superpowers in stupid wars.

24

u/jaggy_bunnet Jun 25 '26

Not just for superpowers - russia's fucked too.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

104

u/Annachroniced Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

I really hope Ukraine will "win" this (although war only really knows losers). Realistically it is very early to make that call. The Ukrainian military also is much more realistic. It is still a horrible fight. Every day soldiers are having very though fights and infrastructure and civilians are targetted and killed. The advantage has switched back and forth and in a couple of months Russia might have the technological advantage again.

31

u/Top_Bat5064 Jun 24 '26

Way too early let's wait another 4 years

→ More replies (5)

63

u/Federal-Piglet Jun 24 '26

Ukraine will not win a land war. They will cause an economic collapse in Russia that leads to the government having to retreat.

30

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/Otherwise_Nobody8148 Jun 24 '26

It's like the first world war in that the line is essentially just a big kill box that neither side can really affect much.

And it's like world war II in that each side can reach out and strike the other at will, line be damned.

World war 3 is really going to suck

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/TenchuReddit Jun 24 '26

The advantage has switched back and forth and in a couple of months Russia might have the technological advantage again.

That's the right way of looking at the situation. War innovation has always been a cycle. Build a better arrow to overcome the shield, then building a better shield to overcome the arrow.

On the other hand, I'm a bit mystified as to why Russia can't match Ukraine's mid-range drone capability, since Russia also has mid-range drones of their own. My guess is that there are structural deficiencies in Russia's military industrial complex, which is rife in corruption and stuck in an inflexible hierarchy that is characteristic of authoritarian regimes.

Ukraine, on the other hand, has adopted a more enterprising model that is driven by a Western model combined with the patriotic drive for survival. Their drone production is highly decentralized yet well-coordinated. That makes the Ukrainians highly resistant to Russia's brutal drone and cruise/ballistic missile assaults.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

11

u/Longjumping_Dress813 Jun 24 '26

The perseverance, ingenuity, resilience, and bravery of the people of Ukraine is amazing to me as an American.  What a culture or group of people or mindset or whatever it is.  They dont need to "win" or get back every inch or whatever goal to have completely left the world in awe for all of future humanity.  I dont have boots on the ground, I am only following from afar from as many sources as I can manage, but what amazing perseverance.  I really look forward to the day they get to celebrate themselves and heal and I know its not all roses and smiles but I hope us other cultures are allowed to do it with them... my lame two cents.  Keep on redditors

→ More replies (1)

28

u/AcceptableFlight67 Jun 24 '26

The State Department thinks we won the war with Iran, I’m not sure they understand winning, tbh.

→ More replies (3)

19

u/350 Jun 24 '26

The front is a total stalemate, Russia's refineries are on fire, and Ukraine is defending their home, it's become a matter of time.

10

u/UmaUmaNeigh Jun 25 '26

So when is the US gonna switch sides so they can declare themselves the Winners?

6

u/NH787 Jun 25 '26

Oh it'll happen, guaranteed. Trump is shameless. He'll act like he was on Ukraine's side all along.

9

u/Skeleton_Glo Jun 25 '26

Ukraine has reshaped warfare with it's drone warfare. Ukraine claims 800k Russian targets hit with drones in 2026 alone. Asymmetrical drone bombs are the biggest innovation in small arms warfare since artillery.

17

u/gingy4life Jun 25 '26

And the US would be VERY stupid to alienate Ukraine at this point. They are dominating the new age of tactical warfare.

7

u/encryptedkraken Jun 25 '26

Extremely embarrassing to have turned in Ukraine pathetically all the red boys and girls and trump are going to be whole heartedly embarrassed and it’ll be obvious that to no thanks to them Ukraine will have won the war once all is said and done. Sad sad Republican Party having made America such an embarrassment

45

u/SayMyNameGolf Jun 24 '26

Do you even wear a suit?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Purgii Jun 24 '26

Who's winning the Iran war?

Who's holding the cards now?

7

u/Reddit_2_2024 Jun 24 '26

Is the Department of State confirming Ukraine "had the cards" afterall, despite the claim made otherwise in the White House a while back?

7

u/HarEr89 Jun 25 '26

Ukraine is winning against a much bigger enemy and Trump is losing against a much weaker enemy.

125

u/Gadshill Jun 24 '26

They really did clear out the intellectuals if this is only being realized now.

96

u/Due-Gap1848 Jun 24 '26

The past few months have been the first time since the Kharkiv and Kherson offensives in 2022 where Ukraine has made sustained net gains in territorial control.

While this is definitely the result of years of favorable attrition, the tide has definitely shifted in Ukraines favor in a way that wasn’t true a few months ago.

11

u/needlestack Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 25 '26

I don’t even think it’s so much about territory any more. Even if the lines are stationary, Ukraine has demonstrated they can make Russia suffer. A million casualties on the front lines isn’t suffering from a Russian perspective, but the losers that support the war actually have to face a small bit of pain now. Russia can not survive continued attacks like the past month.

Short of a nuke, Putin has no path forward. I hope he chooses retreat.

→ More replies (1)

32

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (33)

24

u/SkillPointProblems Jun 24 '26

Ukraine did indeed have all the cards, even if the couch fucker and the orange pdf file tried their hardest to have them surrender.

→ More replies (1)

33

u/Excellent-Sherbet-54 Jun 24 '26

Without much help from the current US government

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Shot-Toe-2884 Jun 24 '26

Gonna need a better source, but it’s pretty obvious right now. And I’ve never seen Russia signal so much about restarting negotiations before this week. Their negotiating position is in the gutter right now. That’s when you slap them silly.

Russia should withdraw from all of Ukraine and they should be required to cap their military size at 20,000 troops.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/ParkerFree Jun 25 '26

Sadly, our government is running by people I don't trust.

5

u/ShameNap Jun 24 '26

It will be a sad realization when Russia figures out they can’t win against Ukraine. Thats going to let the whole world, but mostly themselves, to realize where they rank in the world order.

5

u/GarbageThrown Jun 25 '26

Why would anyone believe anything coming out of this administration? It’s all lies and distractions. Maybe we should see about getting those files released.