So what you're saying is that you'd trust text on pretty website opposed to text posted, that you can verify and actually avoid trust by checking the facts?
If I post random AI gibberish on a beautiful website, you'd trust my opinion and not rely on the data that the text really conveys?
This is literally insane, that you value presentation over factual correctness. I guess this is why we have such shit software nowadays.
I didn't say aesthetics was the only trust signal, no. But if you can't make a functional website in 2026 - and I think this is objectively non-functional without any navigation - then I'm going to doubt what else you know how to do
yeah. that's clearly intentional because this is a self contained page with nothing to do with the rest of the site.
go ahead, look at the other posts. they're all about the same easylang topic and allow navigation back to the logical root. This is a page where it makes little sense to link anywhere but reference for the topic.
Is it "clearly intentional" that the homepage for easylang doesn't link to the blog either then?
It's very normal for a company's blog to write about some random technical topic. If the technical article is good, then it can be a good way to create interest in the product. You shouldn't have to mangle or guess URLs to learn more.
You're absolutely gaslighting me if you say you think this is good UX
Fucking hell, I knew redditors would hate my opinion on the design because they have absolutely no taste whatsoever, but I didn't think they'd completely delude themselves about standard web functionality
The site is functional. The only signal you valued were aesthetics. You showed zero interest in what the link actually talks about. You're as shallow as they come.
-100
u/repeating_bears 1d ago
Call me a snob if you like but I find it hard to trust someone's technical opinion when their website is so ugly
It's not even just aesthetics, there's a lack of basic features like navigation. Why is the entire thing left-aligned?