r/PoursTea Timendi Causa Est Nescire 10h ago

PoliticalTea 🗳️ I completely agree...

Post image
21.6k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/EvilCorp____ 10h ago

Pennsylvania is the 5th most populous state.

The reason we use the electoral college is so that a candidate can't just appease California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois and tell the rest of the country to f*** off. Or just ignore them all together.

At least that was the idea. (Although I think it was New York and Virginia that were the powerhouses back then)

(I agree though we should definitely use the popular vote).

15

u/edebt 10h ago

Instead they just focus on the swing states, so it didn't fix anything, just put the power in the hands of a different group.

1

u/DarKbaldness 9h ago

Swing states change over time. Its not like its the exact same ones every single time.

1

u/cmmpssh 8h ago

People have such a short term view of everything. They think the way things are today are how they're going to be forever. California used to vote Republican. The South used to be the Democrat stronghold.

1

u/Embarrassed_Use6918 9h ago

Ive personally seen several states switch over my lifetime. I don't think this is a fair criticism of the process.

4

u/binzy90 9h ago

Honestly, I never understood the whole concept. A candidate in any other election would prioritize large, populous areas regardless of what office they were running for. Like is someone in the back woods of West Virginia mad that their local county commissioner had a round table at a local school auditorium instead of driving out to the middle of nowhere to meet them? Probably not. But for some reason we act like a presidential candidate appealing to populous states is a bad thing.

0

u/Silly_Somewhere1791 9h ago

The current function is so urbanites in New York aren’t always the ones making decisions for people in rural areas 2,000 miles away. 

4

u/binzy90 8h ago

I understand the intention, but what I'm saying is it shouldn't matter. I used a small scale example just to point out how ridiculous it is. It makes no sense that the majority shouldn't decide the outcome of an election. The reason states like California get to decide isn't because they're better, more powerful, or unfairly prioritized. It's because there are TONS of people there. The 4 most populous states make up one third of the entire US population. People in Wyoming shouldn't have disproportionate voting power just because they live in the middle of nowhere.

1

u/BigConstruction4247 10h ago

Yes, but the founding fathers assumed that states would vote as blocs. They don't and never did.

1

u/Time-Valuable-3355 10h ago

But that's exactly what is going on now. Do you think anything positive has been done by the current president to help California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois?

2

u/Shoddy_Background_48 9h ago

No, but ask the people that are convinced, against all data, that he has.

1

u/Chadrooskie 9h ago

Help Cali, why.
Are they in trouble? The current state government says they’re doing great!!!

1

u/Time-Valuable-3355 9h ago

They have similar problems my state has. High insurance, affordable housing because of housing shortages, and homelessness. The good thing is my state doesn't get earthquakes. M right now food and fuel is a bit pricey.

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 9h ago

Obviously, candidates dont get 100% of each state, and, really, the top 8 states by population are pretty even split in (if you align purple states with the party their state leans towards)

California- 40m Texas- 32m Florida- 24m New York- 20m Pennsylvania- 18m Illinois- 13m Georgia- 12m North Carolina- 11m

But, really, the question i ask people whenever i see the issue you pointed out being discussed is this: If a majority of americans living in a small number of states want something....how are their opinions less valid than the opinionsjhhhh of LESS americans spread out in a larger number of states?

1

u/_jump_yossarian 8h ago

That's not why we have the EC. It was to appease the slave states. What it does is disenfranchise large swaths of people and candidates all but ignore the most populous states during the General because they're either deep red or deep blue.

1

u/GloomyIndividual3965 6h ago

The reason we use the electoral college is so that a candidate can't just appease California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois and tell the rest of the country to f*** off. Or just ignore them all together.

Yeah, instead they ignore the millions of Republicans in CA and NY and the millions of democrats in Texas and Florida and focus their energy on the fucking morons in bumblefuck Wisconsin.

1

u/Radiant_Quality_9386 6h ago

The reason we use the electoral college is so that a candidate can't just appease California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois and tell the rest of the country to f*** off

Our literal system has a candidate appease Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Arizona

FUCK OFF

-1

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

3

u/SaltRequirement1929 10h ago

The founding fathers wanted senators to elect the president. Not the people in a popular vote. look it up- it’s true. Sometime later it evolved to the electoral college.

7

u/EvilCorp____ 10h ago

Yeah, they were worried the people would elect a nut job who didn't know what he was doing..

1

u/Rogerbva090566 10h ago

I’d never heard this before. And you’ve given me homework to do! Thanks a lot. No early to bed for me.