r/Astronomy Mar 27 '20

Mod Post Read the rules sub before posting!

900 Upvotes

Hi all,

Friendly mod warning here. In r/Astronomy, somewhere around 70% of posts get removed. Yeah. That's a lot. All because people haven't bothered reading the rules or bothering to understand what words mean. So here, we're going to dive into them a bit further.

The most commonly violated rules are as follows:

Pictures

Our rule regarding pictures has three parts. If your post has been removed for violating our rules regarding pictures, we recommend considering the following, in the following order:

  1. All pictures/videos must be original content.

If you took the picture or did substantial processing of publicly available data, this counts. If not, it's going to be removed.

2) You must have the acquisition/processing information.

This needs to be somewhere easy for the mods to verify. This means it can either be in the post body or a top level comment. Responses to someone else's comment, in your link to your Instagram page, etc... do not count.

3) Images must be exceptional quality.

There are certain things that will immediately disqualify an image:

  • Poor or inconsistent focus
  • Chromatic aberration
  • Field rotation
  • Low signal-to-noise ratio
  • Images that don't fill the frame because you were shooting through an eyepiece

However, beyond that, we cannot give further clarification on what will or will not meet this criteria for several reasons:

  1. Technology is rapidly changing
  2. Our standards are based on what has been submitted recently (e.g, if we're getting a ton of moon pictures because it's a supermoon, the standards go up to prevent the sub from being spammed)
  3. Listing the criteria encourages people to try to game the system

So yes, this portion is inherently subjective and, at the end of the day, the mods are the ones that decide and the mods are under no obligation to explain this decision to you.

If you are informed that your post was removed because of image quality, arguing about the quality will not be successful. In particular, there are a few arguments that are false or otherwise trite which we simply won't tolerate. These include:

"You let that image that I think isn't as good stay up"

  • See above about how the standards are fluid.

"Pictures have to be NASA quality"

  • They don't.

"You have to have thousands of dollars of equipment"

  • You don't. Technique matters.

"This is a really good photo given my equipment"

  • The standard is "exceptional". Not "exceptional for my equipment".

"This isn't being friendly to beginner astrophotographers"

  • Correct. To keep the sub from being spammed by low quality and low effort posts, this sub has standards.

"My post was getting a lot of upvotes"

  • Upvotes are not an "I get to break the rules" card.

Using the above arguments will not wow mods into suddenly approving your image. It will result in a ban.

Trying to argue with the mods using bad arguments isn't going to fly.

Lastly, it should be noted that we do allow astro-art in this sub. Obviously, it won't have acquisition information, but the content must still be original and mods get the final say on whether on the quality (although we're generally fairly generous on this).

Questions

This rule basically means you need to do your own research before posting.

  • If we look at a post and immediately have to question whether or not you did a Google search, your post will get removed.
  • If you asked Chat GPT or any other LLM, your post will be removed (see our rule regarding sources).
  • If your post is asking for generic or basic information, your post will get removed.
  • If your post is using basic terms incorrectly because you haven't bothered to understand what the words you're using mean, your post will get removed.
  • If you're asking a question based on a basic misunderstanding of the science, your post will get removed.
  • If you're asking a complicated question with a specific answer but didn't give the necessary information to be able to answer the question because you haven't even figured out what the parameters necessary to approach the question are, your post will get removed.

To prevent your post from being removed, tell us specifically what you've tried. Just saying "I GoOgLeD iT" doesn't cut it.

  • What search terms did you use?
  • In what way do the results of your search fail to answer your question?
  • What did you understand from what you found and need further clarification on that you were unable to find?

Furthermore, when telling us what you've tried, we will be very unimpressed if you use sources that are prohibited under our source rule (social media memes, YouTube, AI, etc...).

As with the rules regarding pictures, the mods are the arbiters of how difficult questions are to answer. If you're not happy about that and want to complain that another question was allowed to stand, then we will invite you to post elsewhere with an immediate and permanent ban.

Object ID

We'd estimate that only 1-2% of all posts asking for help identifying an object actually follow our rules. Resources are available in the rule relating to this. If you haven't consulted the flow-chart and used the resources in the stickied comment, your post is getting removed. Seriously. Use Stellarium. It's free. It will very quickly tell you if that shiny thing is a planet which is probably the most common answer. The second most common answer is "Starlink". That's 95% of the ID posts right there that didn't need to be a post.

Do note that many of the phone apps in which you point your phone to the sky and it shows you what you are looing at are extremely poor at accurately determining where you're pointing. Furthermore, the scale is rarely correct. As such, this method is not considered a sufficient attempt at understanding on your part and you will need to apply some spatial reasoning to your attempt.

Pseudoscience

The mod team of r/astronomy has several mods with degrees in the field. We're very familiar with what is and is not pseudoscience in the field. And we take a hard line against pseudoscience. Promoting it is an immediate ban. Furthermore, we do not allow the entertaining of pseudoscience by trying to figure out how to "debate" it (even if you're trying to take the pro-science side). Trying to debate pseudoscience legitimizes it. As such, posts that entertain pseudoscience in any manner will be removed.

Outlandish Hypotheticals

This is a subset of the rule regarding pseudoscience and doesn't come up all that often, but when it does, it usually takes the form of "X does not work according to physics. How can I make it work?" or "If I ignore part of physics, how does physics work?"

Sometimes the first part of this isn't explicitly stated or even understood (in which case, see our rule regarding poorly researched posts) by the poster, but such questions are inherently nonsensical and will be removed.

Sources

ChatGPT and other LLMs are not reliable sources of information. Any use of them will be removed. This includes asking if they are correct or not.

Content

Due to the profusion of AI slop apps, we're no longer allowing apps at all. No, we don't care if you're wanting a "review". No we don't care if they're free. No we don't care if you put it in a website.

Bans

We almost never ban anyone for a first offense unless your post history makes it clear you're a spammer, troll, crackpot, etc... Rather, mods have tools in which to apply removal reasons which will send a message to the user letting them know which rule was violated. Because these rules, and in turn the messages, can cover a range of issues, you may need to actually consider which part of the rule your post violated. The mods are not here to read to you.

If you don't, and continue breaking the rules, we'll often respond with a temporary ban.

In many cases, we're happy to remove bans if you message the mods politely acknowledging the violation. But that almost never happens. Which brings us to the last thing we want to discuss.

Behavior

We've had a lot of people breaking rules and then getting rude when their posts are removed or they get bans (even temporary). That's a violation of our rules regarding behavior and is a quick way to get permabanned. To be clear: Breaking this rule anywhere on the sub will be a violation of the rules and dealt with accordingly, but breaking this rule when in full view of the mods by doing it in the mod-mail will 100% get you caught. So just don't do it.

Claiming the mods are "power tripping" or other insults when you violated the rules isn't going to help your case. It will get your muted for the maximum duration allowable and reported to the Reddit admins.

And no, your mis-interpretations of the rules, or saying it "was generating discussion" aren't going to help either.

While these are the most commonly violated rules, they are not the only rules. So make sure you read all of the rules.


r/Astronomy 14h ago

Astrophotography (OC) The Milky Way Captured on iPhone 17 Pro Max

Post image
1.4k Upvotes

30 second exposure in Mount Teide, Tenerife July 2026


r/Astronomy 7h ago

Astrophotography (OC) The Bubble Nebula

Post image
168 Upvotes

Acquisition:

  • Ha: 61 subs x 300s
  • OIII: 73 subs x 300s
  • SII: 90 subs x 300s
  • R: 37 subs x 60s (stars)
  • G: 31 subs x 60s (stars)
  • ⁠B: 39 subs x 60s (stars)
  • Bortle 6 sky

Equipment:

  • ⁠Telescope: Celestron EdgeHD 800 with 0.7x focal reducer
  • ⁠Mount: Celestron CGX
  • Camera: ZWO ASI2600MM Pro
  • Filters: Antila 3nm SHO
  • Filter Wheel: ZWO EFW
  • Guide Camera: ZWO ASI174MM Mini with OAG

Pixinsight Processing:

  • ⁠Weighted Batch Preprocessing - Stacking
  • ⁠SetiAstro - Automatic DBE Background Extraction ⁠
  • RC Astro BlurXterminator ⁠
  • GraxPert Denoising ⁠
  • ⁠SetiAstro - Statistical Stretch
  • ⁠PixelMath - ForaxX Dynamic Palette ⁠
  • StarNet2 Star removal and replace with RGB Stars

r/Astronomy 21h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Pearl in the Dust, the Iris Nebula

Thumbnail
gallery
885 Upvotes

The Ghostly Dust of the Iris Nebula (NGC 7023) ✨

I've been sitting on this project for a while, because I had trouble tastefully processing this incredibly complex dusty region, with a stunning reflection nebula about 1,300 light-years away. While the stars are beautiful, I think it looks absolutely mesmerizing when they are removed.

Flip through the images to see how removing the starfield completely reveals the massive, dark cosmic dust lanes hiding in the background!

20 hours of data was gathered throughout short, short summer nights at my backyard observatory in Bortle 4.5 skies. Sharpstar 13028HNT hyperbolic newtonian at f/2.8

Which version do you prefer? 🔍

Better details image here: https://app.astrobin.com/i/pau097?r=0#fullscreen


r/Astronomy 22h ago

Astro Research Scientists may have detected the 1st direct evidence of dark matter

Thumbnail
space.com
528 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Tulip Nebula (Sh 2-101)

Thumbnail
gallery
476 Upvotes

The "Tulip Nebula" is located in a vast region of star formation within the constellation Cygnus. You can find the "tulip" in the top right, but I find the surrounding intricate ionized gases are just as fascinating. To my eyes, there's a gigantic bell ringing in the middle.

Fun fact! When the photons represented in this image were emitted about 6,000 years ago, the Earth's axis was not pointed toward the North Star (Polaris) we know and love today. In fact, it aligned almost perfectly with Thuban (Alpha Draconis), a relatively faint star located in the tail of the constellation Draco.

Full frame photo available at: https://app.astrobin.com/i/9dqsdu

Subs: Ha/Oiii 57 x 300s

Total integration time: 4h 45m

Equipment:

  • Telescope: William Optics Pleiades 111
  • Main camera: ZWO ASI2600MC Pro
  • Mount: ZWO AM5N
  • Filter: Optolong L-Ultimate 2"
  • Accessories: ZWO EAF Pro, ZWO 5x2 EFW
  • Guidescope: William Optics Guide Star 61
  • Guide camera: ZWO ASI220MM Mini

Processing:

  • Pleiades Astrophoto PixInsight
    • RC Astro BlurXTerminator
    • RC Astro NoiseXTerminator
    • RC Astro StarXTerminator
  • Adobe Photoshop 2026

r/Astronomy 2h ago

Astro Research Everything we see makes up just 5% of the cosmos

6 Upvotes

Hi all !

One of the most fascinating aspects of modern cosmology (and it rlly blows my mind) is that all ordinary matter, meaning stars, planets, interstellar gas, black holes, and every object we can directly observe, accounts for only about 5% of the total energy density of the Universe.

According to the standard cosmological model, the remaining ~95% consists of dark matter and dark energy, two components that cannot be directly observed through electromagnetic radiation.

The existence of dark matter is inferred from several independent observations, including galaxy rotation curves, gravitational lensing, and the large-scale structure of the Universe. In particular, galaxies rotate at velocities that cannot be explained by the gravitational influence of visible matter alone, implying the presence of a substantial amount of non-luminous mass.

Honestly, I think the fact that ~95% of the Universe remains unexplained is what makes cosmology so exciting.


r/Astronomy 22h ago

Astrophotography (OC) M31: Our Galactic Neighbor

Post image
191 Upvotes

✨ Target: Milky Way + M31

🔭 Mount: Star Adventurer 2i

📷 Camera: Canon EOS 6D mod.

🔎 Lens: Samyang 14mm f/2.8 (f8)

🔬 Sampling: 1.61'/px

🔴 Acquisition: ISO1600

⏰ Integration: 170x60s (2h 50min)

Calibration: 50 dark, 50 flat, 50 dark-flat

💻 Processing: Siril, GIMP, Snapseed

📍 Location: Pantelleria (Italy)

📅 Date: Aug. 11, 2026

🌌 Sky: Bortle 3


r/Astronomy 20h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Complete van den Bergh Catalog (2026)

Thumbnail
gallery
43 Upvotes

Here's the van den Bergh Catalog I completed in 2026

This 2-part poster presents all 159 van den Bergh objects for a total of 374 hours of total integration, with an average of 4h25 / target.

I've also created an interactive PDF version of this poster with pop-up descriptions of each object as you mouse-over the images: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uuf5MQph3m7ZhLZYi-tcjIYaAM9_9iKm

Equipment used:

Setup 1:
Mount: IOptron SkyGuider Pro
Camera: Nikon D5300 astromod
OTA: William Optics Zenithstar 61II + Field Flattener FLAT61A
Focal/Aperture: 360 mm @ f/5.9
Filter: Radian Telescopes 2" Triad Ultra Quad-Band Narrowband Filter
H-beta:5nm, OIII:4nm, H-alpha:4nm, SII:4nm
Guide scope: William Optics Uniguide 32mm
Guide camera: ZWO ASI120MM mini + ASIair Pro

Setup 2:
Mount: IOptron SkyGuider Pro
Camera: Nikon D5300 astromod
OTA: Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR
Accessories: Pixel TW-283 remote controller

All images have been processed in PixInsight. The Poster was done in LibreOffice Impress.

You can also see


r/Astronomy 14h ago

Astrophotography (OC) August '26 moon eclipse

Post image
13 Upvotes

Partial lunar eclipse, shot with a DWARF Mini. 3-frame bursts aligned and stacked in Siril, then cropped and arranged chronologically.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) I found the Eye of Spitzkoppe, Namibia

Post image
4.0k Upvotes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Eagle nebula re edit 40 or 60 hrs I forgot

Post image
537 Upvotes

The Eagle Nebula is an emission nebula located in the constellation Serpens, around 6,500 light-years away. It’s a massive star-forming region filled with clouds of gas and dust, with the famous Pillars of Creation being one of its most recognizable features.
Shot with a Canon R6 Mark II and a Sky-Watcher Quattro 150, with 60 hours of total integration.
Processed in Siril using Cosmic Clarity for sharpening and denoising, background extraction, and Histogram Transformation for the stretch.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Other: [Topic] Tuesday's Daytime Jupiter Occultation a Warm-Up for the "Big One"

Thumbnail
skyandtelescope.org
18 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Lunar eclipse August 2026

Post image
272 Upvotes

Nikon z9 and 400mm 2.8f, in my backyard 😁


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astro Art (OC) We'll never see it in reality, but we can render it in a 3D software

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

110 Upvotes

Just an old neat effect of dolly zoom into a galaxy! From 300 mm focal length to 25 mm. Created in Blender.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Complete Sharpless Catalog (2025)

Thumbnail
gallery
36 Upvotes

Here's the Sharpless Catalog I completed in 2025

This 3-part poster presents all 313 Sharpless objects for a total of 705 hours of total integration, with an average of 4h25 / target.

Completing the Sharpless Catalogue marked a major milestone for me. It was a lot of work for sure and took some good amount of motivation and perseverance but it is very rewarding to complete such massive project.

Equipment used:

Setup 1:
Mount: IOptron SkyGuider Pro
Camera: Nikon D5300 astromod
OTA: William Optics Zenithstar 61II + Field Flattener FLAT61A
Focal/Aperture: 360 mm @ f/5.9
Filter: Radian Telescopes 2" Triad Ultra Quad-Band Narrowband Filter
H-beta:5nm, OIII:4nm, H-alpha:4nm, SII:4nm
Guide scope: William Optics Uniguide 32mm
Guide camera: ZWO ASI120MM mini + ASIair Pro

Setup 2:
Mount: IOptron SkyGuider Pro
Camera: Nikon D5300 astromod
OTA: Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR
Accessories: Pixel TW-283 remote controller

All images have been processed in PixInsight. The Poster was done in LibreOffice Impress.

You can also see


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Hubble tracks new decagon encircling Saturn’s south pole

Thumbnail
esahubble.org
21 Upvotes

r/Astronomy 2d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Sadr Region and the Butterfly Nebula (IC 1318)

Post image
313 Upvotes

Three nights, Aug 31, Sep 1, and Sep 2 2026, from my backyard in Fort Mill, SC (Bortle 6).

Scope: William Optics RedCat 71, 348mm f/4.9
Camera: ZWO ASI2600MC Pro, gain 100, cooled
Filter: Optolong L-Ultimate 3nm dual narrowband
Mount: ZWO AM3N, guided with SVBony SV106 and ASI220MM Mini via ASIAir, 0.35 to 0.55” RMS
Integration: 207 x 350s = 20.1 hours, calibrated with 25 darks, 50 flats, and 50 dark flats

Processing in Siril 1.4.2: stacked with winsorized sigma rejection and noise weighting, SPCC, channel split into Ha and OIII, synthetic luminance built from the linear channels at 0.90 Ha / 0.10 OIII, independent GHS stretches, BlurXTerminator, StarXTerminator, NoiseXTerminator, HOO style palette with a custom PixelMath luminance ratio combine, star recomposition, saturation.


r/Astronomy 8h ago

Other: [Topic] What should exploring the universe actually feel like?

0 Upvotes

Hey everyone, I’m Artem.
My wife and I have been building something for space exploration, and I’d love to get the perspective of people here who are genuinely interested in space.
We’re trying to build a single interactive environment where you can explore the universe rather than just look at information about it.
Not just the Solar System — the idea is to eventually cover everything from nearby objects and planetary systems to stars, galaxies and much further out, while connecting the exploration experience with the scientific information behind those objects.
We’re still very early, so I’m not going to pretend we’ve figured it all out.
What I’m curious about is this:
If you could freely explore the universe from your computer today, what would you actually want to be able to do?
Explore objects? Travel through space? See how things change over time? Compare systems? Get detailed scientific information while exploring? Something completely different?
My wife and I are building toward this idea, and I’d genuinely love to hear what people here think the experience should be.
No sales pitch — just trying to understand what space enthusiasts would actually want.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Other: [Topic] late 19th century book on history of astronomy

2 Upvotes

if you want a bit of dense reading, to have perspective on the way astronomy has changed in a century. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Short_History_of_Astronomy_(1898)/Chapter_11/Chapter_11)


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Discussion: Golden Record The next Golden Record is set to be launched into space in 2030

18 Upvotes

My friend is currently working on the next Golden Record. It's set to be launched into space in 2030. I talked about it—and her specific qualifications to be part of the project (as a musician and photographer, she's focused on visual+audio content)—extensively on my podcast, but since I don't want to be banned, I'm not posting the link here (if you want it, hit me in the comments and I'll send it over!). Some interesting questions she posed when it comes to curating the history of humanity:

  • What do we include?
  • What's considered "big"? What's "small"?
  • When it comes to geography, 70% of the earth's surface is water, but 70% of the pictures won't be of water.
  • Similarly, when it comes to biodiversity, bacteria make up an estimated 50% of all species diversity on Earth, but 50% of the visual+audio content won't be of bacteria.
  • How do we do the storytelling of the earth and of all species justice?
  • How do we put it in a language+context that aliens can understand?

I'm so curious to hear what y'all think about such a vast undertaking.


r/Astronomy 1d ago

Question (Describe all previous attempts to learn / understand) question about physical coherence (scifi story)

0 Upvotes

If you decide to create a solar system up to 2ly from the sun, Would that star create a binary star system with the sun or it can be orbiting the galaxy center in sincrony with our sun? This is because i want to keep the sun as a mono-star.

i want astronomic coherence to make it natural.


r/Astronomy 2d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Complete Caldwell Catalog (2024)

Post image
85 Upvotes

Here's the Caldwell Catalog I completed in 2024

This poster presents all 109 Caldwell objects for a total of 162 hours of total integration, with an average of 1h16 / target.

I've also created an interactive PDF version of this poster with pop-up descriptions of each object as you mouse-over the images: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xDiGxWqF7KshgNnRnv9TAI-t71U4jcNF

Northern Hemisphere objects have been imaged with the following equipment:
Mount: IOptron SkyGuider Pro
Camera: Nikon D5300 astromod
OTA: William Optics Zenithstar 61II + Field Flattener FLAT61A
Focal/Aperture: 360 mm @ f/5.9
Guide scope: William Optics Uniguide 32mm
Guide camera: ZWO ASI120MM mini + ASIair Pro

Southern Hemisphere objects have been imaged with the Slooh Chile Observatory using the following equipment:
Mount: Software Bisque Paramount MEII GEM
Camera: FLI Proline PL16803 Monochrome CCD Camera
OTA: PlaneWave Instruments CDK17
Focal/Aperture: 2938 mm @ f/6.8
Filters: Astrodon Tru-Balance Generation II E-Series Filters (LRGB)

All images have been processed in PixInsight. The Poster was done in LibreOffice Impress.

You can also see:


r/Astronomy 21h ago

Astrophotography (OC) Looking for a chance pixel capture

0 Upvotes

I was wondering if anyone else saw it or better yet, might have recorded it.

This last eclipse I kinda socially reserved for myself. Normally I'll have company over 'cause I'm the nerd with a telescope when facebook astronomy fans surface.

This eclipse i wanted to see what would show its face during maximum. So i setup my 8" flextube dob and had my 32mm Orion 70deg WF eyepiece mounted. I was especially focused not so much for the moon but the space around the moon at maximum, that's why i choose my largest wide-field.

I'm watching the clock and us turn into position and in the void at the 7:00 position, a couple seconds into maximum, appears a star out at the distant 7:00 position. By the brightness and it popping in right then, i was guessing it was about a mag 9 object. That was pretty cool unto itself.

But then something popped in a couple moments later between the moon and the new mystery star. This object was so faint i questioned whether it was really there or i was seeing a reflection, a spot of dust on my EP, or something. So I moved the scope slightly and the object didn't move. It was so faint that its light wasn't even constant. If I had to put a number on it, i'd guess somewhere around a mag 12-14 object. It kinda faded in and out for about 30 seconds and then the blackness returned.

Did anyone catch something in that area. If you're curious, I'd appreciate it if you took a second look.
From my viewpoint on the Dob, Copernicus was to the upper left of the moon. And i was at about 33 deg N latitude.


r/Astronomy 2d ago

Astrophotography (OC) Summer Milkyway above open air archeological museum

Post image
2.1k Upvotes

Some places are worth visiting even at night. I photographed this one in nearby open air archaeological museum. Hope you'll agree.

Shot on Sony a7RV, Viltrox 27mm f1.2 Pro and with help of Syrp Genie Mini II pan&tilt kit. Edited in PTGui, Siril, PS and LR. Exposure info - 20 frame panorama, each at 10s, f1.2 and ISO 1600.